Lee Jun Suh, Hong Tae Ho, Park Byung Joon, Kim Jin Jo
Department of Surgery, Armed Forces Capital Hospital, Seongnam, Korea.
Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2013 Jun;22(3):181-6. doi: 10.3109/13645706.2012.724423. Epub 2012 Sep 12.
We report our experience of transumbilical single port laparoscopic surgery (TUSPLS) for multiple concomitant intraabdominal pathologies, and assess the feasibility of this technique with several technical tips.
Various combined procedures using TUSPLS were performed since April, 2008. All records of concomitant laparoscopic procedures using TUSPLS were searched at three hospitals.
Forty-one patients underwent 82 combined procedures using TUSPLS in a single session. The perioperative outcomes of simultaneously performed cholecystectomy and ovarian cystectomy using TUSPLS (n = 14) are compared with those of using CLS (n = 11). The operating time was significantly longer with the TUSPLS method than with the CLS method. However, postoperative convalescent outcomes such as postoperative hospital stay, VAS pain score, and required analgesics showed no differences between the two methods. Also, there were no significant operative complications associated with the two methods. Fewer trocars were used with the TUSPLS method.
Combined laparoscopic procedures for various concomitant pathologies in the abdomen can be performed using transumbilical single port laparoscopic surgery without increasing morbidity or hospital stay in patients with acceptable risk.
我们报告了经脐单孔腹腔镜手术(TUSPLS)治疗多种并存腹腔内病变的经验,并通过一些技术要点评估了该技术的可行性。
自2008年4月起开展了各种使用TUSPLS的联合手术。在三家医院检索了所有使用TUSPLS的腹腔镜联合手术记录。
41例患者在一次手术中接受了82例使用TUSPLS的联合手术。将使用TUSPLS同时进行胆囊切除术和卵巢囊肿切除术的围手术期结果(n = 14)与使用传统腹腔镜手术(CLS)的结果(n = 11)进行比较。TUSPLS方法的手术时间明显长于CLS方法。然而,两种方法在术后住院时间、视觉模拟评分(VAS)疼痛评分和所需镇痛药等术后恢复结果方面没有差异。此外,两种方法均未出现明显的手术并发症。TUSPLS方法使用的套管针更少。
对于腹部多种并存病变,可采用经脐单孔腹腔镜手术进行联合腹腔镜手术,且不会增加具有可接受风险患者的发病率或住院时间。