Suppr超能文献

晚期非小细胞肺癌二线治疗方案的成本比较:意大利的成本分析

Cost comparison of second-line treatment options for late stage non-small-cell lung cancer: cost analysis for Italy.

作者信息

Schwander Bjoern, Ravera Simona, Giuliani Giovanni, Nuijten Mark, Walzer Stefan

机构信息

Assessment-in-Medicine (AiM) GmbH, Loerrach, Germany;

出版信息

Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. 2012;4:237-43. doi: 10.2147/CEOR.S34371. Epub 2012 Sep 3.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer deaths worldwide (1.38 million cancer deaths, 18.2% of the total) and of cancer morbidity (1.61 million new cases, 12.7% of all new cancers). Currently only three second-line non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) pharmacotherapies are licensed in the European Union: the chemotherapies pemetrexed and docetaxel and the epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor erlotinib. These therapy alternatives have shown a comparable efficacy (survival benefit). In the past, cost comparisons showed that erlotinib was less costly compared to docetaxel, which in turn is cheaper than pemetrexed. Nowadays erlotinib (and docetaxel) are still less expensive than pemetrexed; but docetaxel lost patent protection (basic compound patent) at the end of 2010, so docetaxel drug costs have decreased rapidly and the question remains whether erlotinib is still the least costly therapy alternative in second-line NSCLC.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Italy was selected for base case analysis to compare the total therapy costs, estimated by combining country-specific drug costs, administration costs, and adverse event costs of erlotinib and generic docetaxel in second-line NSCLC therapy. Sensitivity analyses on central input parameters have been performed.

RESULTS

The total costs of treating one patient with erlotinib therapy of €5121 are lower than the docetaxel costs of €6699 for the Italian health care setting. Although the drug costs of erlotinib are higher than generic docetaxel (incremental €3770): the costs of intravenous chemotherapy administration (incremental -€4510), and the costs of adverse event therapy (incremental -€837) lead to higher total therapy costs for docetaxel compared to the epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy erlotinib.

CONCLUSION

The cost comparison findings for Italy show that erlotinib is still the less costly therapy alternative in second-line NSCLC. These results were robust to changes of central input parameters and robust to further potential price decreases for docetaxel.

摘要

背景

肺癌是全球癌症死亡的主要原因(138万例癌症死亡,占总数的18.2%)以及癌症发病的主要原因(161万例新发病例,占所有新发癌症的12.7%)。目前在欧盟仅有三种二线非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)药物疗法获得许可:化疗药物培美曲塞和多西他赛,以及表皮生长因子受体酪氨酸激酶抑制剂厄洛替尼。这些治疗方案已显示出相当的疗效(生存获益)。过去,成本比较表明厄洛替尼的成本低于多西他赛,而多西他赛又比培美曲塞便宜。如今,厄洛替尼(和多西他赛)仍然比培美曲塞便宜;但多西他赛在2010年底失去了专利保护(基本化合物专利),因此多西他赛的药物成本迅速下降,问题仍然是厄洛替尼是否仍然是二线NSCLC中成本最低的治疗方案。

材料与方法

选择意大利进行基础病例分析,以比较二线NSCLC治疗中厄洛替尼和多西他赛仿制药的总治疗成本,该成本通过结合特定国家的药物成本、给药成本和不良事件成本来估算。已对核心输入参数进行敏感性分析。

结果

在意大利的医疗环境中,用厄洛替尼治疗一名患者的总成本为5121欧元,低于多西他赛的成本6699欧元。尽管厄洛替尼的药物成本高于多西他赛仿制药(增加3770欧元):静脉化疗给药成本(增加-4510欧元),以及不良事件治疗成本(增加-837欧元)导致多西他赛的总治疗成本高于表皮生长因子受体酪氨酸激酶抑制剂疗法厄洛替尼。

结论

意大利的成本比较结果表明,厄洛替尼仍然是二线NSCLC中成本较低的治疗方案。这些结果对于核心输入参数的变化具有稳健性,并且对于多西他赛进一步潜在的价格下降也具有稳健性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/467a/3435091/29f5a3e1b4a9/ceor-4-237f1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验