Suppr超能文献

美国食品和药物管理局实施参照标度平均生物等效性方法评估高度变异仿制药产品。

Implementation of a reference-scaled average bioequivalence approach for highly variable generic drug products by the US Food and Drug Administration.

机构信息

Office of Generic Drugs, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, US Food and Drug Administration, 7520 Standish Place, Metro Park North One, Rockville, Maryland 20855, USA.

出版信息

AAPS J. 2012 Dec;14(4):915-24. doi: 10.1208/s12248-012-9406-x. Epub 2012 Sep 13.

Abstract

Highly variable (HV) drugs are defined as those for which within-subject variability (%CV) in bioequivalence (BE) measures is 30% or greater. Because of this high variability, studies designed to show whether generic HV drugs are bioequivalent to their corresponding HV reference drugs may need to enroll large numbers of subjects even when the products have no significant mean differences. To avoid unnecessary human testing, the US Food and Drug Administration's Office of Generic Drugs developed a reference-scaled average bioequivalence (RSABE) approach, whereby the BE acceptance limits are scaled to the variability of the reference product. For an acceptable RSABE study, an HV generic drug product must meet the scaled BE limit and a point estimate constraint. The approach has been implemented successfully. To date, the RSABE approach has supported four full approvals and one tentative approval of HV generic drug products.

摘要

高变异 (HV) 药物是指那些个体内变异率(%CV)在生物等效性(BE)测量中大于 30%的药物。由于这种高度的变异性,即使在产品没有显著的均值差异的情况下,为了证明仿制药 HV 药物是否与相应的 HV 参比药物具有生物等效性,设计的研究可能需要招募大量的受试者。为了避免不必要的人体测试,美国食品和药物管理局的仿制药办公室开发了参考标度平均生物等效性(RSABE)方法,即通过将 BE 接受标准扩展到参比产品的变异性。对于可接受的 RSABE 研究,仿制药 HV 药物产品必须满足经扩展的 BE 限制和点估计限制。该方法已经成功实施。迄今为止,RSABE 方法已经支持了四个 HV 仿制药产品的完整批准和一个暂定批准。

相似文献

3
Viewpoint: observations on scaled average bioequivalence.
Pharm Stat. 2012 Jan-Feb;11(1):1-7. doi: 10.1002/pst.498. Epub 2011 Dec 8.
4
The bioequivalence of highly variable drugs and drug products.
Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2005 Oct;43(10):485-98. doi: 10.5414/cpp43485.
6
An Exact Procedure for the Evaluation of Reference-Scaled Average Bioequivalence.
AAPS J. 2016 Mar;18(2):476-89. doi: 10.1208/s12248-016-9873-6. Epub 2016 Jan 29.
7
Interchangeability between Generic and Reference Products: Limits of Average Bioequivalence Methodology.
Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet. 2022 Nov;47(6):777-787. doi: 10.1007/s13318-022-00785-6. Epub 2022 Aug 19.
8
Controlling type I error in the reference-scaled bioequivalence evaluation of highly variable drugs.
Pharm Stat. 2019 Oct;18(5):583-599. doi: 10.1002/pst.1950. Epub 2019 Jun 12.
9
Likelihood approach for evaluating bioequivalence of highly variable drugs.
Pharm Stat. 2015 Mar-Apr;14(2):82-94. doi: 10.1002/pst.1661. Epub 2014 Nov 19.
10
Some thoughts on drug interchangeability.
J Biopharm Stat. 2016;26(1):178-86. doi: 10.1080/10543406.2015.1092027.

引用本文的文献

2
Bioequivalence and safety assessment of sorafenib tosylate tablets in healthy Chinese subjects under fasting conditions.
Front Pharmacol. 2025 Apr 14;16:1470095. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2025.1470095. eCollection 2025.
3
Pimobendan oral solution is bioequivalent to pimobendan chewable tablets in beagle dogs.
J Vet Intern Med. 2025 Jan-Feb;39(1):e17248. doi: 10.1111/jvim.17248.
5
PBBM Considerations for Base Models, Model Validation, and Application Steps: Workshop Summary Report.
Mol Pharm. 2024 Nov 4;21(11):5353-5372. doi: 10.1021/acs.molpharmaceut.4c00758. Epub 2024 Sep 30.
7
Making drugs from T cells: The quantitative pharmacology of engineered T cell therapeutics.
NPJ Syst Biol Appl. 2024 Mar 18;10(1):31. doi: 10.1038/s41540-024-00355-3.
8

本文引用的文献

1
Sample sizes for designing bioequivalence studies for highly variable drugs.
J Pharm Pharm Sci. 2012;15(1):73-84. doi: 10.18433/j3z88f.
2
Bioequivalence of highly variable drugs: a comparison of the newly proposed regulatory approaches by FDA and EMA.
Pharm Res. 2012 Apr;29(4):1066-77. doi: 10.1007/s11095-011-0651-y. Epub 2011 Dec 28.
3
Common deficiencies with bioequivalence submissions in abbreviated new drug applications assessed by FDA.
AAPS J. 2012 Mar;14(1):19-22. doi: 10.1208/s12248-011-9312-7. Epub 2011 Dec 1.
4
Impact of Biopharmaceutics Classification System-based biowaivers.
Mol Pharm. 2010 Oct 4;7(5):1539-44. doi: 10.1021/mp1001747. Epub 2010 Sep 7.
5
The new European Medicines Agency guideline on the investigation of bioequivalence.
Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol. 2010 Mar;106(3):221-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-7843.2009.00518.x. Epub 2010 Jan 7.
6
Evaluation of bioequivalence for highly variable drugs with scaled average bioequivalence.
Clin Pharmacokinet. 2009;48(11):725-43. doi: 10.2165/11318040-000000000-00000.
8
"One-size-fits-all" in bioavailability and bioequivalence testing?
Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2009 Jul;47(7):419-20. doi: 10.5414/cpp47419.
10
Evaluation of a scaling approach for the bioequivalence of highly variable drugs.
AAPS J. 2008 Sep;10(3):450-4. doi: 10.1208/s12248-008-9053-4. Epub 2008 Aug 26.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验