Department of Neurosurgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109, USA.
J Neurosurg. 2012 Nov;117(5):851-9. doi: 10.3171/2012.8.JNS12234. Epub 2012 Sep 14.
The extent of resection (EOR) is a known prognostic factor in patients with glioblastoma. However, gross-total resection (GTR) is not always achieved. Understanding the factors that prevent GTR is helpful in surgical planning and when counseling patients. The goal of this study was to identify demographic, tumor-related, and technical factors that influence EOR and to define the relationship between the surgeon's impression of EOR and radiographically determined EOR.
The authors performed a retrospective review of the electronic medical records to identify all patients who underwent craniotomy for glioblastoma resection between 2006 and 2009 and who had both preoperative and postoperative MRI studies. Forty-six patients were identified and were included in the study. Image analysis software (FIJI) was used to perform volumetric analysis of tumor size and EOR based on preoperative and postoperative MRI. Using multivariate analysis, the authors assessed factors associated with EOR and residual tumor volume. Perception of resectability was described using bivariate statistics, and survival was described using the log-rank test and Kaplan-Meier curves.
The EOR was less for tumors in eloquent areas (p = 0.014) and those touching ventricles (p = 0.031). Left parietal tumors had significantly greater residual volume (p = 0.042). The average EOR was 91.0% in this series. There was MRI-demonstrable residual tumor in 69.6% of cases (16 of 23) in which GTR was perceived by the surgeon. Expert reviewers agreed that GTR could be safely achieved in 37.0% of patients (17 of 46) in this series. Among patients with safely resectable tumors, radiographically complete resection was achieved in 23.5% of patients (4 of 17). An EOR greater than 90% was associated with a significantly greater 1-year survival (76.5%) than an EOR less than 90% (p = 0.005).
The authors' findings confirm that tumor location affects EOR and suggest that EOR may also be influenced by the surgeon's ability to judge the presence of residual tumor during surgery. The surgeon's ability to judge completeness of resection during surgery is commonly inaccurate. The authors' study confirms the impact of EOR on 1-year survival.
在胶质母细胞瘤患者中,切除范围(EOR)是一个已知的预后因素。然而,并非总能实现完全肿瘤切除(GTR)。了解阻止 GTR 的因素有助于手术规划和患者咨询。本研究的目的是确定影响 EOR 的人口统计学、肿瘤相关和技术因素,并定义外科医生对 EOR 的印象与影像学确定的 EOR 之间的关系。
作者对电子病历进行了回顾性分析,以确定 2006 年至 2009 年间接受开颅手术切除胶质母细胞瘤且术前和术后均有 MRI 研究的所有患者。确定了 46 例患者,并将其纳入本研究。使用图像分析软件(FIJI)根据术前和术后 MRI 对肿瘤大小和 EOR 进行容积分析。使用多变量分析,作者评估了与 EOR 和残留肿瘤体积相关的因素。使用双变量统计学描述可切除性的感知,使用对数秩检验和 Kaplan-Meier 曲线描述生存情况。
在功能区(p = 0.014)和与脑室接触的肿瘤(p = 0.031)中,EOR 较低。左顶叶肿瘤的残留体积明显更大(p = 0.042)。在本系列中,平均 EOR 为 91.0%。在外科医生认为完全切除的 23 例病例中(23 例中有 16 例),MRI 显示有残留肿瘤。专家评审员一致认为,在本系列中,37.0%(46 例中有 17 例)的患者可以安全地进行切除。在可安全切除的肿瘤患者中,影像学上完全切除的患者占 23.5%(17 例中有 4 例)。EOR 大于 90%的患者 1 年生存率显著高于 EOR 小于 90%的患者(p = 0.005)。
作者的发现证实了肿瘤位置会影响 EOR,并表明 EOR 也可能受到外科医生在手术中判断残留肿瘤存在能力的影响。外科医生在手术中判断切除完整性的能力通常不准确。本研究证实了 EOR 对 1 年生存率的影响。