Environmental Science and Technology Department, School of Applied Sciences, Cranfield University, College Road, Cranfield, Bedfordshire, MK43 0AL, UK.
Sci Total Environ. 2012 Nov 1;438:103-12. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2012.08.042. Epub 2012 Sep 11.
Propyzamide and carbetamide are essential for blackgrass control in oilseed rape production. However, both of these compounds can contaminate surface waters and pose compliance problems for water utilities. The transport of propyzamide and carbetamide to an instrumented field drain in a small clay headwater tributary of the Upper Cherwell catchment was monitored over a winter season. Despite having very different sorption and dissipation properties, both herbicides were transported rapidly to the drain outlet in the first storm event after application, although carbetamide was leached more readily than propyzamide. A simple conceptual model was constructed to represent solute displacement from mobile pore water and preferential flow to drains. The model was able to reproduce the timing and magnitude of herbicide losses well, lending support to its conceptual basis. Measured losses in drainflow in the month following application were 1.1 and 8.1%, respectively, for propyzamide and carbetamide. Differences were due to a combination of differences in herbicide mobility and due to the fact that the monitoring period for carbetamide was hydrologically more active. For both compounds, losses were greater than those typically reported elsewhere for other herbicides. The data suggest that drainflow is the dominant pathway for the transfer of these herbicides to the catchment outlet, where water is abstracted for municipal supply. This imposes considerable constraints on the management options available to reduce surface water concentrations of herbicides in this catchment.
敌草隆和杀草隆是油菜生产中防除黑麦草所必需的。然而,这两种化合物都会污染地表水,并给供水公司带来合规问题。在 Upper Cherwell 集水区上游一条小型黏土性源头小溪的仪器化田间排水渠中,监测了敌草隆和杀草隆在一个冬季的输移情况。尽管这两种除草剂具有非常不同的吸附和消解特性,但在施药后的第一场暴雨事件中,它们都迅速被输送到排水口,尽管杀草隆比敌草隆更容易淋溶。构建了一个简单的概念模型来表示从可动的孔隙水中溶质的置换和优先流到排水渠。该模型能够很好地再现除草剂损失的时间和幅度,从而支持其概念基础。施药后一个月,排水中的实测损失分别为敌草隆和杀草隆的 1.1%和 8.1%。差异归因于除草剂移动性的差异和监测期间杀草隆的水文条件更为活跃的综合作用。对于这两种化合物,损失都大于其他地方通常报道的其他除草剂的损失。数据表明,排水是这些除草剂向集水区出口迁移的主要途径,而这些水被用于市政供应。这对减少该集水区中地表水除草剂浓度的管理选择施加了相当大的限制。