Suppr超能文献

内科病房住院患者谵妄临床预测规则的推导与验证:一项观察性研究。

Derivation and validation of a clinical prediction rule for delirium in patients admitted to a medical ward: an observational study.

作者信息

Martinez Juan Antonio, Belastegui Ana, Basabe Iban, Goicoechea Xabier, Aguirre Cristina, Lizeaga Nerea, Urreta Iratxe, Emparanza Jose Ignacio

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, Donostia University Hospital, San Sebastian, Spain.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2012 Sep 14;2(5). doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2012-001599. Print 2012.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To develop and validate a simple clinical prediction rule, based on variables easily measurable at admission, to identify patients at high risk of developing delirium during their hospital stay on an internal medicine ward.

DESIGN

Prospective study of two cohorts of patients admitted between 1 May and 30 June 2008 (derivation cohort), and between 1 May and 30 June 2009 (validation cohort).

SETTING

A tertiary hospital in Donostia-Gipuzkoa (Spain).

PARTICIPANTS

In total 397 patients participated in the study. The mean age and incidence of delirium were 75.9 years and 13%, respectively, in the derivation cohort, and 75.8 years and 25% in the validation cohort.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The predictive variables analysed and finally included in the rule were: being aged 85 years old or older, being dependent in five or more activities of daily living, and taking two or more psychotropic drugs (antipsychotics, benzodiazepines, antidepressants, anticonvulsant and/or antidementia drugs). The variable of interest was delirium as defined by the short Confusion Assessment Method, which assesses four characteristics: acute onset and fluctuating course, inattention, disorganised thinking and altered level of consciousness.

RESULTS

We developed a rule in which the individual risk of delirium is obtained by adding one point for each criterion met (age≥85, high level of dependence, and being on psychotropic medication). The result is considered positive if the score is ≥1. The rule accuracy was: sensitivity=93.4% (95% CI 85.5% to 97.2%), specificity=60.6% (95% CI 54.1% to 66.8%), positive predictive value=44.4% (95% CI 36.9% to 52.1%) and negative predictive value=96.5% (95% CI: 92% to 98.5%). The area under the receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve was 0.85 for the validation cohort.

CONCLUSIONS

The presence or absence of any of the three predictive factors (age≥85, high level of dependence and psychotropic medication) allowed us to classify patients on internal medicine wards according to the risk of developing delirium. The simplicity of the variables in our clinical prediction rule means that the data collection required is feasible in busy medicine units.

摘要

目的

基于入院时易于测量的变量,制定并验证一种简单的临床预测规则,以识别在内科病房住院期间发生谵妄的高危患者。

设计

对2008年5月1日至6月30日入院的两组患者(推导队列)以及2009年5月1日至6月30日入院的两组患者(验证队列)进行前瞻性研究。

地点

西班牙多诺斯蒂亚 - 吉普斯夸的一家三级医院。

参与者

共有397名患者参与了该研究。推导队列中患者的平均年龄和谵妄发生率分别为75.9岁和13%,验证队列中分别为75.8岁和25%。

主要观察指标

分析并最终纳入该规则的预测变量为:年龄85岁及以上、日常生活中五项及以上活动依赖他人、服用两种及以上精神药物(抗精神病药、苯二氮䓬类药物、抗抑郁药、抗惊厥药和/或抗痴呆药)。感兴趣的变量是由简易精神状态检查表定义的谵妄,该检查表评估四个特征:急性起病且病情波动、注意力不集中、思维紊乱和意识水平改变。

结果

我们制定了一条规则,即根据符合的每条标准(年龄≥85岁、高度依赖、服用精神药物)加一分来得出个体发生谵妄的风险。如果得分≥1,则结果被视为阳性。该规则的准确性为:敏感性=93.4%(95%置信区间85.5%至97.2%),特异性=60.6%(95%置信区间54.1%至66.8%),阳性预测值=44.4%(95%置信区间36.9%至52.1%),阴性预测值=96.5%(95%置信区间:92%至98.5%)。验证队列的受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线下面积为0.85。

结论

存在或不存在这三个预测因素(年龄≥85岁、高度依赖和服用精神药物)中的任何一个,使我们能够根据发生谵妄的风险对内科病房的患者进行分类。我们临床预测规则中变量的简单性意味着在繁忙的医疗科室进行所需的数据收集是可行的。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cc88/3467592/ee9ccb948ac7/bmjopen2012001599f01.jpg

相似文献

3
Performance of Electronic Prediction Rules for Prevalent Delirium at Hospital Admission.
JAMA Netw Open. 2018 Aug 3;1(4):e181405. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.1405.
4
The AWOL tool: derivation and validation of a delirium prediction rule.
J Hosp Med. 2013 Sep;8(9):493-9. doi: 10.1002/jhm.2062. Epub 2013 Aug 7.
5
The 4 'A's test for detecting delirium in acute medical patients: a diagnostic accuracy study.
Health Technol Assess. 2019 Aug;23(40):1-194. doi: 10.3310/hta23400.
7
Development and validation of delirium prediction model for critically ill adults parameterized to ICU admission acuity.
PLoS One. 2020 Aug 19;15(8):e0237639. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0237639. eCollection 2020.
8
Development and validation of a delirium predictive score in older people.
Age Ageing. 2014 May;43(3):346-51. doi: 10.1093/ageing/aft141. Epub 2013 Sep 24.
10
Prediction of ICU Delirium: Validation of Current Delirium Predictive Models in Routine Clinical Practice.
Crit Care Med. 2019 Mar;47(3):428-435. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000003577.

引用本文的文献

1
Determining the ground truth for the prediction of delirium in adult patients in acute care: a scoping review.
JAMIA Open. 2025 May 26;8(3):ooaf037. doi: 10.1093/jamiaopen/ooaf037. eCollection 2025 Jun.
4
Predisposing and Precipitating Factors Associated With Delirium: A Systematic Review.
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Jan 3;6(1):e2249950. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.49950.
5
Predictors of hospital readmission for patients diagnosed with delirium: An electronic health record data analysis.
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2023 May;147(5):506-515. doi: 10.1111/acps.13523. Epub 2022 Dec 28.
8
Developing a machine learning model to identify delirium risk in geriatric internal medicine inpatients.
Eur Geriatr Med. 2022 Feb;13(1):173-183. doi: 10.1007/s41999-021-00562-9. Epub 2021 Sep 23.
9
The prevalence, associated factors, clinical impact, and state of diagnosis of delirium in palliative care patients.
Support Care Cancer. 2021 Dec;29(12):7949-7956. doi: 10.1007/s00520-021-06367-7. Epub 2021 Jul 2.
10
Models for Predicting Incident Delirium in Hospitalized Older Adults: A Systematic Review.
J Patient Cent Res Rev. 2017 Apr 25;4(2):69-77. doi: 10.17294/2330-0698.1414. eCollection 2017 Spring.

本文引用的文献

1
Does this patient have delirium?: value of bedside instruments.
JAMA. 2010 Aug 18;304(7):779-86. doi: 10.1001/jama.2010.1182.
3
An intervention integrated into daily clinical practice reduces the incidence of delirium during hospitalization in elderly patients.
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2009 Nov;57(11):2029-36. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2009.02485.x. Epub 2009 Sep 15.
4
Persistent delirium in older hospital patients: a systematic review of frequency and prognosis.
Age Ageing. 2009 Jan;38(1):19-26. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afn253. Epub 2008 Nov 18.
5
Predisposing and precipitating factors for delirium in a frail geriatric population.
J Psychosom Res. 2008 Sep;65(3):249-54. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2008.05.026.
6
One-year health care costs associated with delirium in the elderly population.
Arch Intern Med. 2008 Jan 14;168(1):27-32. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2007.4.
7
Risk factors for intensive care delirium: a systematic review.
Intensive Crit Care Nurs. 2008 Apr;24(2):98-107. doi: 10.1016/j.iccn.2007.08.005. Epub 2007 Oct 18.
8
Characteristics associated with delirium in older patients in a medical intensive care unit.
Arch Intern Med. 2007;167(15):1629-34. doi: 10.1001/archinte.167.15.1629.
9
Interventions for preventing delirium in hospitalised patients.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007 Apr 18(2):CD005563. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005563.pub2.
10
Acurate diagnosis of delirium in elderly patients.
Curr Opin Psychiatry. 2007 May;20(3):262-7. doi: 10.1097/YCO.0b013e3280ec52e5.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验