Suppr超能文献

超声引导可提高低年资住院医师中心静脉置管成功率。

Use of ultrasound guidance improves central venous catheter insertion success rates among junior residents.

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, 464 Congress Ave, Suite 260, New Haven, CT 06519, USA.

出版信息

J Ultrasound Med. 2012 Oct;31(10):1519-26. doi: 10.7863/jum.2012.31.10.1519.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to determine whether junior residents had higher rates of first cannulation and overall success at central venous catheter insertions with the use of ultrasound (US) guidance compared to the landmark technique.

METHODS

We conducted a secondary analysis of data from a prospective randomized controlled study of junior residents from January 2007 through September 2008, which assessed the impact of simulation training on central venous catheter insertion success rates. Blinded independent raters observed in-hospital central venous catheter insertions using a procedural checklist. Success at first cannulation and successful insertion were the primary outcomes. Secondary outcomes included rates of technical errors and mechanical complications.

RESULTS

Independent raters observed 480 central venous catheter insertions by 115 residents. Successful first cannulation occurred in 27% of landmark compared to 49% of dynamic US-guided (P < .01), and 50% of static US-guided (P = .01) cannulations. Insertion success occurred for 55% of landmark compared to 80% of dynamic US-guided (P < .01) and 80% of static US-guided (P < .01) cannulations. Dynamic US guidance was associated with increased odds of first cannulation success compared to the landmark technique (odds ratio [OR], 2.24; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.37-3.67) and successful insertion (OR, 3.80; 95% CI, 2.34-6.19). Static US guidance was associated with increased odds of first cannulation success compared to the landmark technique (OR, 2.59; 95% CI, 1.25-5.39) and successful insertion (OR, 3.48; 95% CI, 1.54-7.87). The results were independent of central venous catheter insertion training, patient comorbidities, and resident specialties. There was no difference related to mechanical complications between the procedures.

CONCLUSIONS

Dynamic and static US guidance during central venous catheter insertion was associated with improved in-hospital first cannulation rates and overall success rates of insertions by junior residents.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在确定与传统的体表定位法相比,在使用超声(US)引导的情况下,初级住院医师首次置管和整体置管成功率是否更高。

方法

我们对 2007 年 1 月至 2008 年 9 月期间一项关于初级住院医师的前瞻性随机对照研究的数据进行了二次分析,该研究评估了模拟培训对中心静脉导管插入成功率的影响。使用程序检查表对住院中心静脉导管插入进行了盲法独立评估。主要观察指标为首次置管成功和整体置管成功。次要观察指标包括技术错误和机械并发症发生率。

结果

115 名住院医师进行了 480 次中心静脉导管插入,独立评估者进行了观察。体表定位组首次置管成功率为 27%,而动态 US 引导组为 49%(P<0.01),静态 US 引导组为 50%(P=0.01)。体表定位组的置管成功率为 55%,而动态 US 引导组为 80%(P<0.01),静态 US 引导组为 80%(P<0.01)。与体表定位技术相比,动态 US 引导与首次置管成功率(比值比 [OR],2.24;95%置信区间 [CI],1.37-3.67)和整体置管成功率(OR,3.80;95% CI,2.34-6.19)增加相关。与体表定位技术相比,静态 US 引导与首次置管成功率(OR,2.59;95% CI,1.25-5.39)和整体置管成功率(OR,3.48;95% CI,1.54-7.87)增加相关。这些结果独立于中心静脉导管插入培训、患者合并症和住院医师专业。两种操作之间在机械并发症方面无差异。

结论

在中心静脉导管插入过程中使用动态和静态 US 引导可提高初级住院医师的院内首次置管率和整体置管成功率。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验