Bhatia Rohit, Shobha Nandavar, Menon Bijoy K, Bal Simerpreet P, Kochar Puneet, Palumbo Vanessa, Wong John H, Morrish William F, Hudon Mark E, Hu William, Coutts Shelagh B, Barber Phillip A, Watson Tim, Goyal Mayank, Demchuk Andrew M, Hill Michael D
Department of Neurology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Int J Stroke. 2014 Dec;9(8):974-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1747-4949.2012.00890.x. Epub 2012 Sep 27.
There is an increasing trend to treating proximal vessel occlusions with intravenous-inter-arterial (IV-IA) thrombolysis. The best dose of IV tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) remains undetermined. We compared the combination of full-dose IV recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rtPA) and IA thrombolytic therapy to IA therapy.
Between 2002 and 2009, we reviewed our computed tomographic angiography database for patients who received full-dose intravenous rtPA and endovascular therapy or endovascular therapy alone for acute ischaemic stroke treatment. Details of demographics, risk factors, endovascular procedure, and symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage were noted. Modified Rankin Scale ≤2 at three-months was used as good outcome. Recanalization was defined as Thrombolysis in Myocardial Ischaemia 2-3 flow on angiography.
Among 157 patients, 104 patients received IV-IA treatment and 53 patients underwent direct IA therapy. There was a higher recanalization rate with IV-IA therapy compared with IA alone (71% vs. 60%, P < 0·21) which was driven by early recanalization after IV rtPA. Mortality and independent outcome were comparable between the two groups. Symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage occurred in 8% of patients (12% in the IA group, 7% in the IV-IA group) but was more frequent as the intensity of intervention increased from device alone to thrombolytic drug alone to device plus thrombolytic drug(s). Recanalization was a strong predictor of reduced mortality risk ratio (RR) 0·48 confidence interval95 0·27-0·84) and favourable outcome (RR 2·14 confidence interval95 1·3-3·5).
Combined IV-IA therapy with full-dose intravenous rtPA was safe and results in good recanalization rates without excess symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage. Testing of full-dose IV tPA followed by endovascular treatment in the IMS3 trial is justified.
采用静脉-动脉内(IV-IA)溶栓治疗近端血管闭塞的趋势日益增加。静脉注射组织型纤溶酶原激活剂(tPA)的最佳剂量仍未确定。我们比较了全剂量静脉注射重组组织型纤溶酶原激活剂(rtPA)与IA溶栓治疗联合IA治疗的效果。
在2002年至2009年期间,我们回顾了计算机断层血管造影数据库中接受全剂量静脉rtPA和血管内治疗或仅接受血管内治疗以治疗急性缺血性卒中的患者。记录了人口统计学、危险因素、血管内手术和症状性颅内出血的详细信息。以三个月时改良Rankin量表≤2作为良好预后。再通定义为血管造影显示心肌缺血溶栓2-3级血流。
157例患者中,104例接受IV-IA治疗,53例接受直接IA治疗。与单独IA治疗相比,IV-IA治疗的再通率更高(71%对60%,P < 0·21),这是由静脉rtPA后的早期再通驱动的。两组的死亡率和独立预后相当。症状性颅内出血发生在8%的患者中(IA组为12%,IV-IA组为7%),但随着干预强度从单纯器械增加到单纯溶栓药物再到器械加溶栓药物,其发生率更高。再通是降低死亡风险比(RR)0·48(95%置信区间0·27 - 0·84)和良好预后(RR 2·14,95%置信区间1·3 - 3·5)的有力预测指标。
全剂量静脉rtPA联合IV-IA治疗是安全的,可实现良好的再通率,且不会出现过多的症状性颅内出血。在IMS3试验中对全剂量静脉tPA进行测试后再进行血管内治疗是合理的。