O'Connor Rollanda E, Bocian Kathleen M, Sanchez Victoria, Beach Kristen D
University of California, Riverside, Riverside, CA, USA
University of California, Riverside, Riverside, CA, USA.
J Learn Disabil. 2014 Jul-Aug;47(4):307-28. doi: 10.1177/0022219412459354. Epub 2012 Sep 26.
In this study, we tested the outcomes of access to a response to intervention (RtI) model in kindergarten or in first grade on end-of-Grade-2 reading achievement and placement in special education. Across five schools, 214 students who began having access to Tier 2 intervention in kindergarten or first grade were compared in Grades 1 and 2 with 208 cohort peers who were average readers and 102 historical control condition second grade poor readers who did not receive Tier 2 intervention. Results demonstrated significant effects on reading achievement for access to RtI in kindergarten at the end of first grade (effects averaged 0.48), but not in second grade, except for students who were English language learners (ELLs), who showed an advantage through the end of second grade. Students with access to RtI overall had significantly higher outcomes at the end of Grade 2 than students in the historical control, with no differences resulting from ELL status. No significant difference in the proportion of students placed in special education was noted; however, a greater proportion of the students found eligible as with learning disabilities had poor reading scores if they were placed after participating in RtI.
在本研究中,我们测试了幼儿园或一年级采用回应干预(RtI)模式对二年级末阅读成绩及特殊教育安置情况的影响。在五所学校中,将214名在幼儿园或一年级开始接受二级干预的学生在一、二年级时与208名同龄普通阅读者以及102名未接受二级干预的历史对照条件下的二年级阅读能力差的学生进行了比较。结果表明,在一年级末,幼儿园采用RtI模式对阅读成绩有显著影响(平均效应为0.48),但在二年级时没有,不过英语学习者(ELLs)除外,他们在二年级末都表现出优势。总体而言,接受RtI模式的学生在二年级末的成绩显著高于历史对照组的学生,且不受ELL身份的影响。在特殊教育安置的学生比例上没有显著差异;然而,如果参与RtI后被认定有学习障碍的学生,其阅读成绩较差的比例更高。