Khokhlov V D, Krut' M I, Sashko S Iu
Klin Med (Mosk). 2012;90(7):62-4.
A rare case of sudden fatal anaphylactic shock is described in a 50 year-old woman after secondary lidocaine blockade to relieve lumbar pain (the first blockade was performed 4 days before by the same physician after the negative skin test). The patient had the history of multiple allergic reactions to drugs, pollen, home dust, and citrus fruits (repeated Quincke's oedema). In the preceding period, lidocaine was several time administered without side effects during out-patient visits to a surgeon and dentist. The signs of anaphylactic shock appeared within 2 min after injection of 4 ml of 2% lidocaine solution (no other injections were made between the two blockades). Comprehensive emergency measures had no effect. The diagnosis was confirmed at autopsy; microscopic study of soft tissues revealed mast cell degranulation and characteristic changes in internal organs. A literature review of anaphylactic shock symptoms is presented. The fulminant development of this condition after lidocaine administration may be regarded as a fatal coincidence of circumstances that could not be foreseen by the physician. Caution is needed when prescribing medications to polyallergic patients.
本文描述了一例罕见的致命性过敏性休克病例,患者为一名50岁女性,在进行第二次利多卡因阻滞以缓解腰痛后发生(第一次阻滞由同一位医生在4天前进行,皮肤试验为阴性)。该患者有对药物、花粉、室内灰尘和柑橘类水果多次过敏反应的病史(反复出现昆克水肿)。在此之前,利多卡因在外科医生和牙医的门诊就诊期间多次给药,均无副作用。在注射4毫升2%利多卡因溶液后2分钟内出现过敏性休克症状(两次阻滞之间未进行其他注射)。综合急救措施无效。尸检确诊;软组织显微镜检查显示肥大细胞脱颗粒和内脏器官的特征性变化。本文还对过敏性休克症状进行了文献综述。利多卡因给药后这种情况的暴发性发展可被视为医生无法预见的致命巧合。给多过敏患者开药时需要谨慎。