Bone tissue response to BMP-2 adsorbed on amorphous microporous silica implants.

AIM

To evaluate bone regeneration potential of bone morphogenetic protein-2 (BMP-2) adsorbed on amorphous microporous silica (AMS).

MATERIALS & METHODS: Four implants [titanium as control (CTR); AMS-coated titanium (AMS), BMP-2 adsorbed on titanium (CTR+BMP) and AMS (AMS+BMP)] were implanted randomly in the tibiae of 20 New Zealand white rabbits. Bone specimens with implants were retrieved 2/4 weeks post implantation and analysed histologically and histomorphometrically. Bone fraction was measured in initial bone-free area (bone regeneration area, BRA) and in the area with initial bone-implant contact [bone adaptation area (BAA)] (BF(BRA) & BF(BAA) ). Bone-implant contact was measured in BRA (BIC(BRA) ). In vitro BMP-2 release profiles were determined to evaluate the impact of the carrier surface. Mixed models were used for statistical analysis.

RESULTS

BMP-2 release profiles were different for CTR+BMP and AMS+BMP. BIC(BRA) and BF(BRA) were significantly increased after 4 weeks compared to 2 weeks for AMS, CTR+BMP and AMS+BMP. However, no differences between the implant types were observed within both healing periods. BF(BAA) for CTR+BMP was smaller than that for CTR and AMS+BMP after 4 weeks. Despite slower BMP-2 release, AMS+BMP did not stimulate bone regeneration. CTR+BMP caused bone resorption at the bone-implant interface.

CONCLUSIONS

BMP-2 functionalized implant surfaces failed to stimulate bone regeneration and osseointegration.