Suppr超能文献

依恋个体差异是否能预测围产期丧失后丧亲结局?一项前瞻性队列研究。

Are individual differences of attachment predicting bereavement outcome after perinatal loss? A prospective cohort study.

机构信息

Freiburg Institute of Advanced Studies, Interdisciplinary Research Groups, Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center, Albert-Ludwigs-University Freiburg, Germany.

出版信息

J Psychosom Res. 2012 Nov;73(5):375-82. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2012.08.017. Epub 2012 Sep 13.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to examine the influence of attachment, social support and the quality of the current partnership on the outcome of bereavement after perinatal loss.

METHODS

In a prospective cohort design 33 women after perinatal loss were approached on admission to hospital and reassessed four weeks, four months and nine months later. The initial assessment included the Adult Attachment Interview and self-report questionnaires for social support and quality of the current partnership. Bereavement outcome was assessed using measures of grief (MTS), depression and anxiety (HADS), psychological distress (BSI), somatisation (BSI-SOM) and symptoms of PTSD (PDS).

RESULTS

All measures of outcome showed a significant improvement over time. Standardized effect sizes between the initial assessment and nine month follow-up ranged between .36 for anxiety (HADS) and 1.02 for grief (MTS). Social support, quality of the partnership and secure attachment correlated inversely, and insecure preoccupied attachment correlated positively with the outcome measures. Preoccupied attachment was included as a predictor in two multivariate statistical models of non-linear regression analysis, one with somatisation (adjusted R2=.698, P=.016), the other with posttraumatic stress symptoms at nine month follow-up (adjusted R2=.416, P=.002) as target variable. Initial assessment scores of psychological distress predicted the course of the respective measure during follow-up (adjusted R2=.432, P=.014).

CONCLUSION

Attachment, social support and the quality of the current partnership have an impact on the course of bereavement after perinatal loss. Secondary prevention after the event may focus on these factors in order to offer specific counselling and support.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在探讨依恋、社会支持和当前伴侣关系质量对围产期丧失后丧亲结局的影响。

方法

采用前瞻性队列设计,在住院时对 33 名围产期丧失后的女性进行评估,并在 4 周、4 个月和 9 个月后进行重新评估。初始评估包括成人依恋访谈和社会支持及当前伴侣关系质量的自我报告问卷。丧亲结局采用 grief(MTS)、抑郁和焦虑(HADS)、心理困扰(BSI)、躯体化(BSI-SOM)和创伤后应激症状(PDS)的测量来评估。

结果

所有结局测量均随时间显著改善。初始评估与 9 个月随访之间的标准化效应大小在焦虑(HADS)为 0.36,悲伤(MTS)为 1.02 之间。社会支持、伴侣关系质量与安全依恋呈负相关,而不安全的痴迷依恋与结局测量呈正相关。痴迷依恋被纳入两个非线性回归分析的多元统计模型作为预测因子,一个是躯体化(调整 R2=.698,P=.016),另一个是 9 个月随访时的创伤后应激症状(调整 R2=.416,P=.002)。初始评估的心理困扰分数预测了随访期间各测量值的变化(调整 R2=.432,P=.014)。

结论

依恋、社会支持和当前伴侣关系质量对围产期丧失后的丧亲过程有影响。事件发生后的二级预防可能会关注这些因素,以提供特定的咨询和支持。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验