Department of Infectious Diseases, The Fifth People's Hospital of Shanghai, Fudan University, Shanghai 200240, China.
Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol. 2012 Dec;36(6):592-7. doi: 10.1016/j.clinre.2012.05.012. Epub 2012 Oct 12.
The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of lamivudine or adefovir alone for 96 weeks versus initial treatment with the combination of lamivudine and adefovir for 12 to 24 weeks followed by adefovir alone. One hundred and fifty patients with HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis B were randomized equally to lamivudine and adefovir diprivoxil combination therapy (LA), lamivudine alone (L), or adefovir dipivoxil alone (A) in a multicenter randomized clinical trial. In the LA group, the earliest time for lamivudine discontinuation was 12 weeks and adefovir monotherapy was continued until 96 weeks. Groups L and A received monotherapies for 96 weeks. At 12 weeks, the decrease in HBV DNA, percentage of patients with negative HBV DNA, and ALT normalization rate for the LA group were comparable to those of group L, but superior to those of group A. At 24 weeks, the rates of negative HBV DNA and HBeAg seroconversion of group LA were significantly higher than the monotherapy groups. This superiority was subsequently preserved during the maintenance phase with adefovir monotherapy. Starting at 48 weeks, the mean HBV DNA level of group L increased over the 24-week level. In contrast, the A group's rates of virological response, biochemical response, and HBeAg seroconversion continued to improve. At week 96, the percentage of patients with undetectable DNA and HBe seroconversion of LA group (100%, 51%) was higher than that of L (66%, 21%) and A group (49%, 33%), while no significant difference was observed between the L and A groups. During the course of therapy, no lamivudine- or adefovir-resistance mutations were discovered in the LA group. Rates of adverse reactions were comparable between the three groups. Combination therapy with lamivudine and adefovir for 12 to 24 weeks followed by adefovir monotherapy significantly improved antiviral efficacy and reduced drug resistance without compromising safety and tolerability compared to either drug alone in HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis B.
本研究旨在比较拉米夫定或阿德福韦酯单独治疗 96 周与拉米夫定和阿德福韦酯联合治疗 12 至 24 周后改用阿德福韦酯单药治疗的疗效。150 例 HBeAg 阳性慢性乙型肝炎患者按 1:1:1 的比例随机分为拉米夫定和阿德福韦酯联合治疗组(LA 组)、拉米夫定组(L 组)和阿德福韦酯组(A 组),进行多中心随机临床试验。在 LA 组中,最早停用拉米夫定的时间为 12 周,继续阿德福韦酯单药治疗至 96 周。L 组和 A 组均接受单药治疗 96 周。治疗 12 周时,LA 组 HBV DNA 下降幅度、HBV DNA 转阴率和 ALT 复常率与 L 组相当,但优于 A 组。治疗 24 周时,LA 组的 HBV DNA 转阴率和 HBeAg 血清学转换率明显高于单药治疗组。这种优势在随后的阿德福韦酯单药维持治疗阶段得以维持。从 48 周开始,L 组的平均 HBV DNA 水平较 24 周时升高。相比之下,A 组的病毒学应答、生化学应答和 HBeAg 血清学转换率持续改善。治疗 96 周时,LA 组的患者 HBV DNA 转阴率和 HBe 血清学转换率(100%,51%)高于 L 组(66%,21%)和 A 组(49%,33%),而 L 组和 A 组之间无显著差异。治疗过程中,LA 组未发现拉米夫定或阿德福韦酯耐药突变。三组不良反应发生率相当。拉米夫定和阿德福韦酯联合治疗 12 至 24 周后改用阿德福韦酯单药治疗,与单独使用两种药物相比,可显著提高抗病毒疗效,降低耐药发生率,且不影响安全性和耐受性。