Department of Kinesiology, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State 39762, USA.
Sports Biomech. 2012 Sep;11(3):402-13. doi: 10.1080/14763141.2011.638724.
When the ankle is forced into inversion, the speed at which this movement occurs may affect the extent of injury. The purpose of this investigation was to develop a fulcrum device to mimic the mechanism of a lateral ankle sprain and to determine the reliability and validity of the temporal variables produced by this device. Additionally, this device was used to determine if a single previous lateral ankle sprain or ankle taping effected the time to maximum inversion and/or mean inversion speed. Twenty-six participants (13 with history of a single lateral ankle sprain and 13 with no history of injury) completed the testing. The participants completed testing on three separate days, performing 10 trials with the fulcrum per leg on each testing day, and tape was applied to both ankles on one testing day. No significant interactions or main effects were found for either previous injury or ankle taping, but good reliability was found for time to maximum inversion (ICC = .81) and mean inversion speed (ICC = .79). The findings suggest that although neither variable was influenced by the history of a single previous lateral ankle sprain or ankle taping, both variables demonstrated good reliability and construct validity, but not discriminative validity.
当踝关节被迫内翻时,该运动发生的速度可能会影响损伤的程度。本研究的目的是开发一种支点装置来模拟外侧踝关节扭伤的机制,并确定该装置产生的时间变量的可靠性和有效性。此外,该装置还用于确定单次既往外侧踝关节扭伤或踝关节贴扎是否会影响最大内翻时间和/或平均内翻速度。26 名参与者(13 名有单侧外侧踝关节扭伤史,13 名无损伤史)完成了测试。参与者在三个不同的日子进行了测试,每条腿用支点完成了 10 次试验,并且在一天的测试中给两条脚踝贴上了胶带。无论是既往损伤还是踝关节贴扎,都没有发现显著的交互作用或主要影响,但最大内翻时间(ICC =.81)和平均内翻速度(ICC =.79)的可靠性较好。研究结果表明,尽管既往单次外侧踝关节扭伤或踝关节贴扎的历史均不会影响这两个变量,但这两个变量都表现出较好的可靠性和结构有效性,但不具有鉴别有效性。