Suppr超能文献

[背景噪声下弗莱堡单音节言语测试的评估]

[Evaluation of the Freiburg monosyllabic speech test in background noise].

作者信息

Löhler J, Akcicek B, Pilnik M, Saager-Post K, Dazert S, Biedron S, Oeken J, Mürbe D, Löbert J, Laszig R, Wesarg T, Langer C, Plontke S, Rahne T, Machate U, Noppeney R, Schultz K, Plinkert P, Hoth S, Praetorius M, Schlattmann P, Meister E F, Pau H W, Ehrt K, Hagen R, Shehata-Dieler W, Cebulla M, Walther L E, Ernst A

机构信息

HNO-Praxis, Wissenschaftliches Institut für angewandte HNO-Heilkunde, Bad Bramstedt.

出版信息

HNO. 2013 Jul;61(7):586-91. doi: 10.1007/s00106-012-2598-7.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Freiburg speech test has been the gold standard in speech audiometry in Germany for many years. Previously, however, this test had not been evaluated in assessing the effectiveness of a hearing aid in background noise. Furthermore, the validity of particular word lists used in the test has been questioned repeatedly in the past, due to a suspected higher variation within these lists as compared to the other word list used.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In this prospective study, two groups of subjects [normal hearing control subjects and patients with SNHL (sensorineural hearing loss) that had been fitted with hearing aid] were examined. In a first group, 113 control subjects with normal age- and gender-related pure tone thresholds were assessed by means of the Freiburg monosyllabic test under free-field conditions at 65 dB. The second group comprised 104 patients that had been fitted with hearing aids at least 3 months previously to treat their SNHL. Members of the SNHL group were assessed by means of the Freiburg monosyllabic test both with and without hearing aids, and in the presence or absence of background noise (CCITT-noise; 65/60 dB signal-noise ratio, in accordance with the Comité Consultatif International Téléphonique et Télégraphique), under free-field conditions at 65 dB.

RESULTS

The first (control) group exhibited no gender-related differences in the Freiburg test results. In a few instances, inter-individual variability of responses was observed, although the reasons for this remain to be clarified. Within the second (patient) group, the Freiburg test results under the four different measurement conditions differed significantly from each other (p>0.05). This group exhibited a high degree of inter-individual variability between responses. In light of this, no significant differences in outcome could be assigned to the different word lists employed in the Freiburg speech test.

CONCLUSION

The Freiburg monosyllabic test is able to assess the extent of hearing loss, as well as the effectiveness of a fitted hearing aid, in the presence or absence of background-noise (CCITT-noise). The present study could not evidence statistically significant differences in outcome when using the different word lists in this test battery.

摘要

背景

多年来,弗莱堡言语测试一直是德国言语测听的金标准。然而,此前该测试尚未在评估助听器在背景噪声中的有效性方面进行过评估。此外,由于怀疑与使用的另一组单词列表相比,测试中使用的特定单词列表内的变异性更高,过去人们曾多次对这些单词列表的有效性提出质疑。

患者与方法

在这项前瞻性研究中,对两组受试者进行了检查,一组为听力正常的对照受试者,另一组为已佩戴助听器的感音神经性听力损失(SNHL)患者。在第一组中,对113名年龄和性别相关纯音阈值正常的对照受试者,在自由声场条件下,于65分贝时通过弗莱堡单音节测试进行评估。第二组包括104名至少在3个月前已佩戴助听器以治疗其SNHL的患者。SNHL组的成员在佩戴和不佩戴助听器的情况下,以及在有或没有背景噪声(CCITT噪声;65/60分贝信噪比,符合国际电报电话咨询委员会标准)的情况下,于自由声场条件下65分贝时通过弗莱堡单音节测试进行评估。

结果

第一组(对照组)在弗莱堡测试结果中未表现出与性别相关的差异。在少数情况下,观察到个体间反应的变异性,尽管其原因仍有待阐明。在第二组(患者组)中,四种不同测量条件下的弗莱堡测试结果彼此之间存在显著差异(p>0.05)。该组在反应之间表现出高度的个体间变异性。有鉴于此,无法将不同结果的显著差异归因于弗莱堡言语测试中使用的不同单词列表。

结论

弗莱堡单音节测试能够在有或没有背景噪声(CCITT噪声)的情况下,评估听力损失的程度以及佩戴助听器的有效性。本研究未能证明在该测试组中使用不同单词列表时结果存在统计学上的显著差异。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验