Latcu Decebal Gabriel, Bun Sok-Sithikun, Arnoult Mathieu, Ricard Philippe, Rinaldi Jean-Paul, Saoudi Nadir
Centre Hospitalier Princesse Grace, Avenue Pasteur 98000, Monaco.
J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2013 Jan;36(1):19-25; discussion 25. doi: 10.1007/s10840-012-9729-7. Epub 2012 Oct 19.
Catheter ablation of typical atrial flutter (AFl) is succesful if double electrograms on the ablation line are widely separated. Nevertheless, a small interval may also be compatible with complete isthmus block. Predicting such a situation may avoid useless additionnal radiofrequency (RF) applications. We postulated that measuring the extra-isthmus activation time (EIAT) on the counterclockwise (CCW) flutter wave is correlated with the extra-isthmus conduction time after a proven block.
Files of 76 patients (71 males, 71 ± 12 years) ablated for typical CCW AFl were reviewed. Ten had 2/1 conduction prohibiting reliable measurement. Three patients with proven crista terminalis shunt were also excluded. In the remaining 63 patients, EIAT was measured on the surface ECG before the first RF pulse from the beginning of the negative deflection of the F wave in lead III to the end of the positive deflection (or beginning of the plateau). After successful ablation and completion of block, right atrial (RA) CCW (during low septal pacing), and clockwise (CW) (during low lateral pacing) activation times were measured.
Flutter cycle length was 247 ± 34 ms and EIAT was 142 ± 25 ms. A bidirectionnal isthmus block was obtained in all patients after an RF delivery time of 623 ± 546 s. At a pacing cycle length of 681 ± 71 ms, RA CCW and CW activation times were 147 ± 23 and 139 ± 26 ms, respectively. There was a good correlation between EIA, RA CCW (r = 0.75, p < 0.0001), and CW (r = 0.69, p = 0.0002) activation times.
EIAT on the flutter wave is an easy and feasible measure. It is correlated with extra-isthmus RA conduction time after block completion. EIAT can be used as a measure to predict the post cavo-tricuspid isthmus block RA activation time.
如果消融线上的双电位电图间距较宽,则典型心房扑动(AFl)的导管消融是成功的。然而,较小的间期也可能与峡部完全阻滞相容。预测这种情况可以避免不必要的额外射频(RF)应用。我们推测,测量逆时针(CCW)扑动波上的峡外激动时间(EIAT)与证实阻滞后的峡外传导时间相关。
回顾了76例(71例男性,年龄71±12岁)因典型CCW AFl接受消融治疗的患者资料。10例患者存在2/1传导,无法进行可靠测量。3例经证实存在终末嵴分流的患者也被排除。在其余63例患者中,在首次RF脉冲前,从III导联F波负向偏转开始至正向偏转结束(或平台期开始),在体表心电图上测量EIAT。成功消融并完成阻滞后,测量右心房(RA)的CCW(在低位间隔起搏时)和顺时针(CW)(在低位侧壁起搏时)激动时间。
扑动周期长度为247±34 ms,EIAT为142±25 ms。在RF发放时间为623±546 s后,所有患者均获得双向峡部阻滞。在起搏周期长度为681±71 ms时,RA的CCW和CW激动时间分别为147±23 ms和139±26 ms。EIAT与RA的CCW(r = 0.75,p < 0.0001)和CW(r = 0.69,p = 0.0002)激动时间之间存在良好的相关性。
扑动波上的EIAT是一种简单可行的测量方法。它与阻滞后峡外RA传导时间相关。EIAT可作为预测腔静脉-三尖瓣峡部阻滞后RA激动时间的一种测量方法。