Suppr超能文献

诊室美白与家庭美白的长期疗效:一项为期2年的双盲随机临床试验

Long-term efficacy of in-office and at-home bleaching: a 2-year double-blind randomized clinical trial.

作者信息

Tay Lidia Yileng, Kose Carlos, Herrera Daniel Rodrigo, Reis Alessandra, Loguercio Alessandro Dourado

机构信息

Department of Restorative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, State University of Ponta Grossa, Paraná, Brazil.

出版信息

Am J Dent. 2012 Aug;25(4):199-204.

Abstract

PURPOSE

This parallel, double-blind randomized clinical trial evaluated the 2-year bleaching efficacy and sensitivity produced by at-home (AH) and in-office (IO) bleaching therapies.

METHODS

60 participants with tooth color darker than C2, without restorations in the anterior dentition and older than 18 years old, were randomly allocated into two groups to receive either IO with 35% hydrogen peroxide or AH with 16% carbamide peroxide. Color was recorded at baseline (BA); 1-week (1W); end of the treatment (ET); and 2 years (2Y) after bleaching, using the Vita Classical shade guide. The perception of TS was recorded on a 0-4 scale during and 2Y after bleaching. The variation in shade guide units (deltaSGU) from BA vs. 1W was compared to deltaSGU from BA vs. 2Y using paired t-test. The percentage of subjects who reported TS was evaluated by Fisher's exact test. The intensity of TS was evaluated by a Mann-Whitney test (alpha=0.05).

RESULTS

Both bleaching techniques demonstrated equivalent and significant tooth color shade lightening. No significant color rebound occurred after 2Y for both techniques (P= 0.77 and 0.87, for AH and IO respectively). The absolute risk of TS was similar for IO and AH (P= 0.12), however the intensity of TS was significantly higher for IO (P= 0.001). No subjects reported sensitivity after 2Y.

摘要

目的

本平行、双盲随机临床试验评估了家庭(AH)和诊室(IO)漂白疗法产生的2年漂白效果和敏感性。

方法

60名牙齿颜色比C2深、前牙无修复体且年龄超过18岁的参与者被随机分为两组,分别接受35%过氧化氢的诊室漂白或16%过氧化脲的家庭漂白。使用Vita经典比色板在基线(BA)、1周(1W)、治疗结束时(ET)和漂白后2年(2Y)记录颜色。在漂白期间和漂白后2年,以0-4级记录牙齿敏感(TS)的感知情况。使用配对t检验比较BA与1W之间色板单位变化量(deltaSGU)和BA与2Y之间的deltaSGU。通过Fisher精确检验评估报告有TS的受试者百分比。TS的强度通过Mann-Whitney检验进行评估(α=0.05)。

结果

两种漂白技术均显示出同等且显著的牙齿颜色变浅。两种技术在2年后均未出现明显的颜色反弹(AH和IO分别为P=0.77和0.87)。IO和AH的TS绝对风险相似(P=0.12),然而IO的TS强度显著更高(P=0.001)。2年后没有受试者报告有敏感性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验