Department of Radiology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100730, People's Republic of China.
Eur J Radiol. 2013 Feb;82(2):220-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2012.09.015. Epub 2012 Oct 18.
To compare the quantitative liver computed tomography perfusion (CTP) differences among eight hepatic segments.
This retrospective study was based on 72 acquired upper abdomen CTP scans for detecting suspected pancreas tumor. Patients with primary or metastatic liver tumor, any focal liver lesions except simple cyst (<3 cm in diameter), history of liver operation or splenectomy, evidence of liver cirrhosis or invasion of portal vein were excluded. The final analysis included 50 patients (M:F=21:29, mean age=43.2 years, 15-76 years). Arterial liver perfusion (ALP), portal-venous perfusion (PVP), total hepatic perfusion (THP=ALP+PVP), and hepatic perfusion index (HPI) of each hepatic segment were calculated and compared by means of one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and the Bonferonni correction method.
Compared to hepatic segments 5, 6, 7 and 8, segments 2 and 3 showed a tendency of higher ALPs, lower PVPs, and higher HPIs, most of which were statistically significant (p<0.05). Hepatic segments 1 and 4 had higher mean values of ALP and HPI and lower mean values of PVP than segments 5, 6, 7 and 8 as well, although no significant differences were detected except for ALP and HPI for liver segments 1 and 7 (p=0.001 and 0.035 respectively), and ALP for liver segments 1 and 5 (p=0.039). Higher ALP and HPI were showed in hepatic segment 3 compared to segment 4 (p=0.000 and 0.000 respectively). No significant differences were found for THP among eight segments.
Intra-hepatic perfusion differences exist in normal hepatic parenchyma especially between lateral sector (segments 2 and 3) and right lobe (segments 5, 6, 7 and 8). This might have potential clinical significance in liver-perfusion-related protocol design and result analysis.
比较 8 个肝段的定量肝脏 CT 灌注(CTP)差异。
本回顾性研究基于 72 例上腹部 CTP 扫描,用于检测疑似胰腺肿瘤。排除原发性或转移性肝肿瘤、除单纯囊肿(直径<3cm)外的任何局灶性肝病变、肝手术或脾切除术史、肝硬化或门静脉侵犯证据的患者。最终分析包括 50 名患者(男:女=21:29,平均年龄 43.2 岁,15-76 岁)。通过单因素方差分析(ANOVA)和 Bonferroni 校正法计算并比较各肝段的动脉肝灌注(ALP)、门静脉灌注(PVP)、总肝灌注(THP=ALP+PVP)和肝灌注指数(HPI)。
与肝段 5、6、7 和 8 相比,肝段 2 和 3 表现出 ALP 较高、PVP 较低和 HPI 较高的趋势,其中大多数具有统计学意义(p<0.05)。肝段 1 和 4 的 ALP 和 HPI 平均值较高,PVP 平均值较低,与肝段 5、6、7 和 8 相比,除肝段 1 和 7 的 ALP 和 HPI(p=0.001 和 0.035)和肝段 1 和 5 的 ALP(p=0.039)外,无显著差异。与肝段 4 相比,肝段 3 的 ALP 和 HPI 更高(p=0.000 和 0.000)。8 个肝段之间的 THP 无显著差异。
正常肝实质存在肝内灌注差异,特别是在外侧叶(肝段 2 和 3)和右叶(肝段 5、6、7 和 8)之间。这在与肝灌注相关的方案设计和结果分析中可能具有潜在的临床意义。