Key Laboratory for Water and Sediment Science of Ministry of Education, School of Environment, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China.
J Hazard Mater. 2012 Nov 30;241-242:164-72. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2012.09.023. Epub 2012 Sep 21.
The contamination and ecological risks of six metals (i.e., As, Cu, Mn, Pb, Sb and Zn) in sediments of the Yangtze Estuary were assessed using two typical index approaches, (i.e., total content and speciation indices). Special attention was paid to the relationships between the two index methods. The ecological risk of each sampling site was uniformly low to moderate in degree. The contamination levels of these sites were low to moderate according to the speciation index used, while the total content indices indicated a moderate to considerate contamination. A significant positive relationship existed between the two index methods when assessing the risks of Cu, Pb and Zn, while negative correlations and inconsistencies existed for As, Mn and Sb. The correlation behaviors were mainly dependent to three metal factors: the fractional distribution, the enrichment degree and the toxic response factors. Significant correspondences were observed between the total content and the speciation indices when assessing the ecological risks of each sampling site and each metal (Cu, Pb or Zn), while discrepancies were found between the two approaches when assessing the contamination of specific sites in the estuary area.
采用总量和形态两种典型指数方法,评估了长江口沉积物中 6 种金属(砷、铜、锰、铅、锑和锌)的污染及生态风险,并特别关注了两种指数方法之间的关系。各采样点的生态风险均为低度到中度均匀水平。根据形态指数,这些采样点的污染水平为低到中度,而总量指数则表明存在中度到高度的污染。在评估铜、铅和锌的风险时,两种指数方法之间存在显著的正相关关系,而砷、锰和锑则存在负相关和不一致的关系。这种相关行为主要取决于三个金属因素:分数分布、富集程度和毒性响应因子。在评估每个采样点和每个金属(铜、铅或锌)的生态风险时,总量和形态指数之间存在显著的对应关系,而在评估河口特定区域特定站点的污染时,两种方法之间存在差异。