Suppr超能文献

急性冠脉综合征行冠状动脉支架置入术的糖尿病患者应用氯吡格雷负荷剂量后行普拉格雷维持治疗的血小板反应性。

Platelet reactivity in diabetic patients undergoing coronary stenting for acute coronary syndrome treated with clopidogrel loading dose followed by prasugrel maintenance therapy.

机构信息

Département de Cardiologie, CHU Timone, Marseille, F-13385 France.

出版信息

Int J Cardiol. 2013 Sep 20;168(1):523-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2012.09.214. Epub 2012 Oct 16.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Diabetes has been identified as a risk factor for impaired clopidogrel response, and these patients might have greater benefit with new P2Y12 blockers such as prasugrel. The present study was designed to assess response to thienopyridine in diabetic patients undergoing PCI for ACS.

METHODS AND RESULTS

107 diabetic patients undergoing PCI for ACS were included and treated by clopidogrel 600 mg loading dose and switched to prasugrel 10mg daily after PCI. Platelet reactivity was assessed by PRI VASP. High-on-treatment platelet reactivity (HTPR) was defined by PRI VASP>50% and Low-on-treatment platelet reactivity (LTPR) as PRI VASP below the 75th percentile (PRI VASP<20%). After clopidogrel, mean PRI VASP was 47 ± 21% and 54 patients (50%) were non responders. At one month, mean PRI VASP on prasugrel 10mg daily was 31 ± 13%, 9 patients (8%) had HTPR and 23 patients (22%) had LTPR. In multivariate analysis, factors associated with platelet reactivity were waist circumference for HTPR on clopidogrel and body weight for HTPR and LTPR on prasugrel. 10 patients (9%) suffered from BARC bleeding complications. Patients with bleeding complications had significantly lower PRI VASP values: 22 ± 9 vs. 32 ± 13, p=0.02 and ROC curves identified a cut-off value of VASP=28% to predict bleeding complications.

CONCLUSION

The present study confirmed that many diabetic patients treated with clopidogrel for ACS have inadequate platelet inhibition. Switch to prasugrel is effective with acceptable safety in this specific population. We observed a significant relationship between on-treatment platelet reactivity and bleeding complications.

摘要

背景

糖尿病已被确定为氯吡格雷反应受损的一个危险因素,这些患者可能从新的 P2Y12 抑制剂(如普拉格雷)中获益更大。本研究旨在评估糖尿病患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)治疗急性冠脉综合征(ACS)时噻吩吡啶类药物的反应。

方法和结果

共纳入 107 例糖尿病合并 ACS 患者,行 PCI 治疗,给予氯吡格雷 600mg 负荷剂量,PCI 后转换为每日 10mg 普拉格雷。采用 PRI VASP 评估血小板反应性。高反应血小板(HTPR)定义为 PRI VASP>50%,低反应血小板(LTPR)定义为 PRI VASP<75 百分位(PRI VASP<20%)。氯吡格雷治疗后,平均 PRI VASP 为 47±21%,54 例(50%)患者无反应。在一个月时,每日 10mg 普拉格雷治疗的平均 PRI VASP 为 31±13%,9 例(8%)患者出现 HTPR,23 例(22%)患者出现 LTPR。多因素分析显示,氯吡格雷治疗时,HTPR 与腰围相关,普拉格雷治疗时,HTPR 和 LTPR 与体重相关。10 例(9%)患者发生 BARC 出血并发症。出血并发症患者的 PRI VASP 值明显较低:22±9 vs. 32±13,p=0.02,ROC 曲线确定了 VASP=28%的截断值以预测出血并发症。

结论

本研究证实,许多接受氯吡格雷治疗的 ACS 糖尿病患者的血小板抑制作用不足。在该特定人群中,转换为普拉格雷是有效的,安全性可接受。我们观察到治疗中血小板反应性与出血并发症之间存在显著关系。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验