Preston R Julian
National Health and Environmental Effects Research Laboratory, US Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27711, USA.
Toxicol Pathol. 2013 Feb;41(2):322-5. doi: 10.1177/0192623312464437. Epub 2012 Oct 19.
The ability of a chemical to induce mutations has long been a driver in the cancer risk assessment process. The default strategy has been that mutagenic chemicals demonstrate linear cancer dose responses, especially at low exposure levels. In the absence of additional confounding information, this is a reasonable approach, because risk assessment is appropriately considered as being protective of human health. The concept of mode of action has allowed for an opportunity to move off this default position; mutagenicity is now not considered as the driver but rather the mode of action is. In a more precise way, it is the set of key events that define a mode of action that is fundamental in defining the shape of a cancer dose response. A key event is an informative bioindicator of the cancer response and as such should be predictive of the tumor response, at least in a qualitative way. A clear example of the use of key events in cancer risk assessment is for DNA reactive chemicals. A series of such key events is initiated by the production of DNA damage in target cells from direct interaction of the chemical with DNA leading to the production of mutations by misreplication that results in enhanced cell replication. This enhanced cell replication eventually leads to the development of preneoplastic cells and ultimately overt neoplasms. The response of each of these key events to dose of the chemical can inform the cancer dose-response curve shape. Thus, the dose-response curve for any DNA-reactive chemical can be predicted from knowledge of its mode of action and the behavior of the induced key events.
一种化学物质诱发突变的能力长期以来一直是癌症风险评估过程的一个推动因素。默认策略是,致突变化学物质表现出线性癌症剂量反应,尤其是在低暴露水平下。在没有其他混杂信息的情况下,这是一种合理的方法,因为风险评估被恰当地视为对人类健康的保护。作用模式的概念为摆脱这一默认立场提供了契机;现在,致突变性不再被视为驱动因素,而是作用模式成为驱动因素。更确切地说,是定义作用模式的一系列关键事件在定义癌症剂量反应的形状方面至关重要。关键事件是癌症反应的一个有信息价值的生物指标,因此至少在定性方面应该能够预测肿瘤反应。在癌症风险评估中使用关键事件的一个明显例子是针对DNA反应性化学物质。一系列这样的关键事件是由化学物质与DNA直接相互作用在靶细胞中产生DNA损伤引发的,这种相互作用导致错配复制产生突变,进而导致细胞复制增强。这种增强的细胞复制最终导致癌前细胞的发展并最终形成明显的肿瘤。这些关键事件中的每一个对化学物质剂量的反应都可以为癌症剂量反应曲线的形状提供信息。因此,任何DNA反应性化学物质的剂量反应曲线都可以根据其作用模式和诱导的关键事件的行为来预测。