Desa Kristian, Peric Mladen, Husedzinovic Ino, Sustic Alan, Korusic Andelko, Karadza Vjekoslav, Matlekovic Drazen, Prstec-Veronek Branka, Zuvic-Butorac Marta, Sokolic Jadranko, Siranovic Mladen, Bosnjak Danica, Spicek-Macan Jasna, Gustin Denis, Ozeg-Jakopovic Drazenka
Department for anesthesiology and ICM, University hospital Rijeka, Tome Strizica 3, Rijeka, Croatia.
Croat Med J. 2012 Oct;53(5):442-9. doi: 10.3325/cmj.2012.53.442.
To perform an external validation of the original Simplified Acute Physiology Score II (SAPS II) system and to assess its performance in a selected group of patients in major Croatian hospitals.
A prospective, multicenter study was conducted in five university hospitals and one general hospital during a six-month period between November 1, 2007 and May 1, 2008. Standardized hospital mortality ratio (SMR) was calculated from the mean predicted mortality of all the 2756 patients and the actual mortality for the same group of patients. The validation of SAPS II was made using the area under receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), 2×2 classification tables, and Hosmer-Lemeshow tests.
The predicted mortality was as low as 14.6% due to a small proportion of medical patients and the SMR being 0.89 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.78-0.98). The SAPS II system demonstrated a good discriminatory power as measured by the AUC (0.85; standard error [SE]=0.012; 95% CI=0.840-0.866; P<0.001). This system significantly overestimated the actual mortality (Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit H statistic: χ(2) =584.4; P<0.001 and C statistics: χ(2)(8) =313.0; P<0.001) in the group of patients included in the study.
The SAPS II had a good discrimination, but it significantly overestimated the observed mortality in comparison with the predicted mortality in this group of patients in Croatia. Therefore, caution is required when an evaluation is performed at the individual level.
对原始简化急性生理学评分系统II(SAPS II)进行外部验证,并评估其在克罗地亚主要医院选定患者群体中的性能。
于2007年11月1日至2008年5月1日的六个月期间,在五所大学医院和一所综合医院进行了一项前瞻性多中心研究。根据2756例患者的平均预测死亡率和同一组患者的实际死亡率计算标准化医院死亡率(SMR)。使用受试者操作特征曲线下面积(AUC)、2×2分类表和Hosmer-Lemeshow检验对SAPS II进行验证。
由于内科患者比例较小,预测死亡率低至14.6%,SMR为0.89(95%置信区间[CI],0.78 - 0.98)。SAPS II系统通过AUC测量显示出良好的区分能力(0.85;标准误差[SE]=0.012;95% CI=0.840 - 0.866;P<0.001)。该系统在纳入研究的患者群体中显著高估了实际死亡率(Hosmer-Lemeshow拟合优度H统计量:χ(2)=584.4;P<0.001和C统计量:χ(2)(8)=313.0;P<0.001)。
SAPS II具有良好的区分能力,但与克罗地亚该组患者的预测死亡率相比,它显著高估了观察到的死亡率。因此,在个体水平进行评估时需要谨慎。