Institute of Psychology, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Cogn Sci. 2012 Nov-Dec;36(8):1532-41. doi: 10.1111/cogs.12002.
The "testing effect" refers to the finding that after an initial study opportunity, testing is more effective for long-term retention than restudying. The testing effect seems robust and is a finding from the field of cognitive science that has important implications for education. However, it is unclear whether this effect also applies to the acquisition of problem-solving skills, which is important to establish given the key role problem solving plays in, for instance, math and science education. Worked examples are an effective and efficient way of acquiring problem-solving skills. Forty students either only studied worked examples (SSSS) or engaged in testing after studying an example by solving an isomorphic problem (STST). Surprisingly, results showed equal performance in both conditions on an immediate retention test after 5 min, but the SSSS condition outperformed the STST condition on a delayed retention test after 1 week. These findings suggest the testing effect might not apply to acquiring problem-solving skills from worked examples.
“测试效应”是指在初次学习机会后,测试比复习更有利于长期保持的发现。测试效应似乎很可靠,是认知科学领域的一个发现,对教育具有重要意义。然而,目前尚不清楚这种效应是否也适用于解决问题技能的习得,鉴于解决问题在数学和科学教育等方面的关键作用,确定这一点很重要。例题是获取解决问题技能的一种有效且高效的方法。四十名学生要么只研究例题(SSSS),要么在研究完例题后通过解决同构问题进行测试(STST)。令人惊讶的是,结果显示,在 5 分钟后的即时保持测试中,两种条件下的表现相同,但在 1 周后的延迟保持测试中,SSSS 条件的表现优于 STST 条件。这些发现表明,测试效应可能不适用于从例题中获得解决问题的技能。