Suppr超能文献

[临床肺部感染评分对重症监护病房机械通气患者下呼吸道多重耐药菌检测的分析]

[Analysis on the clinical pulmonary infection score on the detection of multidrug resistance organisms in lower respiratory tract in ventilated patients in intensive care unit].

作者信息

Liu Huan

机构信息

Department of Intensive Care Unit, Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Liuzhou, Guangxi, China. liuhuan.

出版信息

Zhongguo Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2012 Nov;24(11):680-2.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the characteristics of multidrug resistance (MDR) organisms from the lower respiratory tract in ventilated patients, and the constitution, detection time and mortality of the intensive care unit (ICU) patients with different clinical pulmonary infection scores (CPIS).

METHODS

A retrospective study was conducted. The clinical data of 72 cases with lower respiratory tract MDR on ventilation more than 48 hours were collected from April 2010 to December 2011. CPIS were calculated at the same time. Thirty-three patients with CPIS>6 were diagnosed as ventilation associated pneumonia (VAP), while 39 having CPIS ≤6 (non-VAP). The characteristics of MDR, the detection time and mortality of the patients were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

The first five MDR were Baumannii [49.5%(34/74)], Klebsiella pneumoniae [24.3%(18/74)], Escherichia coli [20.3%(15/74)], Pseudomonas aeruginosa [5.4%(4/74)] and Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus [MRSA, 4.1%(3/74)] in VAP group, while the first five were Escherichia coli [40.2%(37/92)], Pseudomonas aeruginosa [33.7%(31/92)], Klebsiella pneumoniae [13.1%(12/92)], Baumannii [8.7%(8/92)] and MRSA [4.3%(4/92)] in non-VAP group. There was no significant difference in average detection time between VAP group and non-VAP group (10.7±1.5 days vs. 9.4±1.8 days, P>0.05). The mortality rate in VAP group was significantly higher than that in non-VAP group (39.4% vs. 23.1%, P<0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Different MDR may be detected in lower respiratory tracts no matter the ventilated patients having VAP or not, which influence the patients prognosis and should be monitored intensively. Antibiotics should be empirically prescribed and adjusted dynamically.

摘要

目的

探讨机械通气患者下呼吸道多重耐药(MDR)菌的特点,以及不同临床肺部感染评分(CPIS)的重症监护病房(ICU)患者的构成、检测时间及死亡率。

方法

进行一项回顾性研究。收集2010年4月至2011年12月期间72例机械通气48小时以上的下呼吸道MDR患者的临床资料,同时计算CPIS。CPIS>6的33例患者被诊断为呼吸机相关性肺炎(VAP),CPIS≤6的39例患者为非VAP。比较两组患者的MDR特点、检测时间及死亡率。

结果

VAP组前五位的MDR依次为鲍曼不动杆菌[49.5%(34/74)]、肺炎克雷伯菌[24.3%(18/74)]、大肠埃希菌[20.3%(15/74)]、铜绿假单胞菌[5.4%(4/74)]和耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌[MRSA,4.1%(3/74)];非VAP组前五位依次为大肠埃希菌[40.2%(37/92)]铜绿假单胞菌[33.7%(31/92)]、肺炎克雷伯菌[13.1%(12/92)]、鲍曼不动杆菌[8.7%(8/92)]和MRSA[4.3%(4/92)]。VAP组与非VAP组的平均检测时间差异无统计学意义(10.7±1.5天对9.4±1.8天,P>0.05)。VAP组的死亡率显著高于非VAP组(39.4%对23.1%,P<0.05)。

结论

无论机械通气患者是否发生VAP,下呼吸道均可检测到不同的MDR菌,影响患者预后,应加强监测。应根据经验使用抗生素并动态调整。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验