Suppr超能文献

一期修复合并室间隔缺损的主动脉缩窄时的持续脑灌注和心肌灌注。

Continuous cerebral and myocardial perfusion during one-stage repair for aortic coarctation with ventricular septal defect.

作者信息

Chen Huiwen, Hong Haifa, Zhu Zhongqun, Liu Jinfen

机构信息

Heart Center, Shanghai Children's Medical Center, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Dongfang Road 1678, Shanghai, China.

出版信息

Pediatr Cardiol. 2013 Apr;34(4):872-9. doi: 10.1007/s00246-012-0561-8. Epub 2012 Nov 7.

Abstract

Controversy still exists concerning the use of deep hypothermic circulatory arrest (DHCA) and selective antegrade cerebral perfusion (SACP) for repair of aortic coarctation (CoA) with ventricular septal defect (VSD). This report therefore describes outcomes of patients undergoing continuous cerebral and myocardial perfusion (CCMP) under mild hypothermia compared with DHCA and SACP. Retrospective analysis was performed for 110 consecutive patients undergoing anatomic reconstruction of CoA with VSD closure between 1999 and 2011. Patients repaired under CCMP with mild hypothermia (32 °C) (group A, n = 60) were compared with those repaired under DHCA (18 °C) and SACP (group B, n = 50). In group A, the single arterial cannula perfusion technique was used for 15 patients (25 %), and the dual arterial cannula perfusion technique was used for 45 patients (75 %). The preoperative data were similar in the two groups. Group A had no hospital mortalities, compared with two mortalities (4 %) in group B. Group A had shorter myocardial ischemic and cardiopulmonary times, fewer delayed sternal closures, a shorter time to extubation, lower postoperative lactate levels, and fewer patients with low cardiac output requiring extracorporeal membrane oxygenation or with multiorgan failure than group B. During the postoperative course, no clinical or electrical neurologic events occurred in either group. The mean follow-up period was 5.2 ± 3.2 years for group A and 7.5 ± 3.1 years for group B (P = 0.048). One late death occurred in group B and no late deaths in group A. The actuarial survival for the two groups was similar (100 % for group A vs 96 % for group B; P = 0.264). The freedom from all types of cardiac reintervention was 96.7 % in group A and 89.6 % in group B (P = 0.688). All the patients were free of neurologic symptoms. The authors' perfusion strategy using CCMP with mild hypothermia for repair of CoA with VSD is feasible, safe, and associated with improved postoperative recovery and should be the method of choice.

摘要

关于在修复合并室间隔缺损(VSD)的主动脉缩窄(CoA)时使用深低温停循环(DHCA)和选择性顺行脑灌注(SACP)仍存在争议。因此,本报告描述了与DHCA和SACP相比,在轻度低温下接受持续脑和心肌灌注(CCMP)的患者的治疗结果。对1999年至2011年间连续110例接受CoA解剖重建并关闭VSD的患者进行了回顾性分析。将在轻度低温(32°C)下接受CCMP修复的患者(A组,n = 60)与在DHCA(18°C)和SACP下修复的患者(B组,n = 50)进行比较。在A组中,15例患者(25%)使用单动脉插管灌注技术,45例患者(75%)使用双动脉插管灌注技术。两组的术前数据相似。A组无住院死亡病例,而B组有2例死亡(4%)。与B组相比,A组的心肌缺血和心肺时间更短,延迟关胸更少,拔管时间更短,术后乳酸水平更低,需要体外膜肺氧合或发生多器官功能衰竭的低心输出量患者更少。在术后过程中,两组均未发生临床或电神经性事件。A组的平均随访期为5.2±3.2年,B组为7.5±3.1年(P = 0.048)。B组发生1例晚期死亡,A组无晚期死亡。两组的精算生存率相似(A组为100%,B组为96%;P = 0.264)。A组所有类型心脏再次干预的自由度为96.7%,B组为89.6%(P = 0.688)。所有患者均无神经症状。作者采用CCMP联合轻度低温修复CoA合并VSD的灌注策略是可行、安全的,且与术后恢复改善相关,应作为首选方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验