Attitude towards oneself and others in non-clinical population, depressed and paranoid examinees.

BACKGROUND

The theoretical concept of existential/life positions describes person's basic beliefs about oneself and others. Most of authors on TA postulated that every person has one of four possible basic life positions: I'm OK, you're OK; I'm not OK, you're OK; I'm OK, you're not OK and I'm not OK, you're not OK. The aim of this study was the authentication of Existential positions as theoretical concepts in Transaction Analysis, and it's potential to discriminate clinical from non-clinical examinees, and paranoid from depressive examinees within the clinical population.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

The research conducted was co-relational. The sample belongs to the convenience sample type, and comprised 200 examinees, 100 from the non-clinical and 100 from the clinical population of adults.

RESULTS

The results of the research confirm a statistically significant difference between the non-clinical and clinical part of the sample in the examined theoretical concept. The "I am not OK" existential position is more expressed in the clinical part of the sample. The differences between the examinees with depressive and paranoid disorders indicate that the examinees with the depressive disorder are more likely to express the "I am not OK, you are OK" and "I am not OK, you are not OK" Existential position.

CONCLUSION

In general, we can infer that the assumptions which the research was aimed at testing received partial validation. Examinees from the clinical part of the sample have a statistically significantly higher score at the position "I am not OK". Examinees with depressive characteristics have a more pronounced "I am not OK, you are not OK" position.