Suppr超能文献

富马酸比索洛尔薄膜包衣片两种制剂在健康受试者中的生物等效性研究。

Bioequivalence study of two formulations of bisoprolol fumarate film-coated tablets in healthy subjects.

作者信息

Tjandrawinata Raymond R, Setiawati Effi, Yunaidi Danang Agung, Santoso Iwan Dwi, Setiawati Arini, Susanto Liana W

机构信息

Dexa Laboratories of Biomolecular Sciences (DLBS), Cikarang, Indonesia.

出版信息

Drug Des Devel Ther. 2012;6:311-6. doi: 10.2147/DDDT.S36567. Epub 2012 Oct 30.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The present study was conducted to compare the bioavailability of two bisoprolol fumarate 5 mg film-coated tablet formulations (test and reference formulations).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This study was a randomized, single-blind, two-period, two-sequence crossover study that included 18 healthy adult male and female subjects under fasting condition. The pharmacokinetic parameters were determined based on the concentrations of bisoprolol (CAS 66722-44-9), using ultraperformance liquid chromatography with a tandem mass spectrometer detector. In each of the two study periods (separated by a washout of 1 week) a single dose of test or reference product was administered. The pharmacokinetic parameters assessed were area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero to 48 hours (AUC(t)), AUC from time zero to infinity (AUC(inf)), the peak plasma concentration of the drug (C(max)), time needed to achieve C(max) (t(max)), and the elimination half-life (t(1/2)).

RESULTS

The geometric mean ratios (90% confidence intervals) of the test drug/reference drug for bisoprolol were 101.61% (96.14%-107.38%) for AUC(t), 101.31% (95.66%-107.29%) for AUC(inf), and 100.28% (93.90%-107.09%) for C(max). The differences between the test and reference drug products for bisoprolol t(max) and t(1/2) values were not statistically significant (P > 0.05). There was no adverse event encountered during this bioequivalence test. The 90% confidence intervals of the test/reference AUC ratio and C(max) ratio of bisoprolol were within the acceptance range for bioequivalence.

CONCLUSION

It was concluded that the two bisoprolol film-coated tablet formulations (the test and reference products) were bioequivalent in terms of the rate and extent of absorption.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在比较两种富马酸比索洛尔5毫克薄膜包衣片制剂(试验制剂和参比制剂)的生物利用度。

患者和方法

本研究为随机、单盲、两周期、两序列交叉研究,纳入18名空腹状态下的健康成年男性和女性受试者。使用超高效液相色谱串联质谱检测器,根据比索洛尔(CAS 66722-44-9)的浓度测定药代动力学参数。在两个研究周期中的每个周期(间隔1周的洗脱期),给予单剂量的试验产品或参比产品。评估的药代动力学参数包括从零时间到48小时的血浆浓度-时间曲线下面积(AUC(t))、从零时间到无穷大的AUC(AUC(inf))、药物的血浆峰浓度(C(max))、达到C(max)所需的时间(t(max))以及消除半衰期(t(1/2))。

结果

比索洛尔的试验药物/参比药物几何平均比值(90%置信区间)为:AUC(t)为101.61%(96.14%-107.38%),AUC(inf)为101.31%(95.66%-107.29%),C(max)为100.28%(93.90%-107.09%)。比索洛尔的试验产品和参比产品在t(max)和t(1/2)值上的差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。在该生物等效性试验期间未遇到不良事件。比索洛尔的试验/参比AUC比值和C(max)比值的90%置信区间在生物等效性的接受范围内。

结论

得出结论,两种富马酸比索洛尔薄膜包衣片制剂(试验产品和参比产品)在吸收速率和程度方面具有生物等效性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/998d/3489052/6865946e9c2a/dddt-6-311f1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验