Suppr超能文献

[CA(125)在预测上皮性卵巢癌患者最佳间隔肿瘤细胞减灭术及其预后中的价值]

[Value of CA(125) in the prediction of optimal interval debulking surgery and its prognosis in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer].

作者信息

Mu Tian, Li Xiao-ping, Wang Jian-liu, Wang Shi-jun, Wang Yue, Sun Xiu-li, Cui Heng, Wei Li-hui

机构信息

Department of Gynecology, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China.

出版信息

Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2012 Aug;47(8):566-70.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the changes of CA(125) between primary cytoreductive surgery and interval debulking surgery for prediction the rate of optimal interval cytoreductive surgery and prediction the recurrence and the prognosis in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer.

METHODS

A total of 39 cases with suboptimal primary cytoreductive surgery admitted from Jan. 1996 to Jan. 2009 were retrospectively analyzed. The median age of patients was 56 years (range: 41 - 68 years). Based on the changes in CA(125) level between primary cytoreductive surgery and interval debulking surgery, all cases were divided into four groups, group A (CA(125) reduced to normal after primary cytoreductive surgery, n = 6), group B (CA(125) reduced to normal after 1-2 cycles of chemotherapy, n = 11), group C (CA(125) reduced to normal after 3-4 cycles of chemotherapy, n = 14), and group D (CA(125) did not reduced to normal after the chemotherapy, n = 8), and all received platinum-based chemotherapy. The response to chemotherapy evaluated by pathological examination versus CA(125) level, and recurrence and prognoses were also analyzed.

RESULTS

(1) The rate of optimal interval cytoreductive surgery in group A, B, C and D were 6/6, 8/11, 9/14 and 2/8 respectively, in which there were statistically different between group A or B and group D (P < 0.05). (2) The clinical benefit rates evaluated by the pathological examination in group A, B, C and D were 4/6, 4/11, 5/14 and 0, respectively and there were statistically different between group A and group D (P = 0.030). (3) There was significant difference in the recurrence rate between group A and group D (3/6 vs. 8/8, P = 0.024), while there were not significant differences between group B or C and group D (all P > 0.05). The rate of drug-resistant recurrence in group A, B, C and D were 1/6, 3/11, 5/14 and 7/8, respectively, in which there were significant differences between group A, B or C and group D (all P < 0.05). (4) The median progression-free survival (PFS) for patients in group A, B, C and D were 32, 10, 18 and 3 months, respectively, in which there were significant differences in the PFS between group A, B or C and group D (P = 0.012, P = 0.003, P = 0.032). The median overall survival (OS) were 44, 45, 44 and 16 months, respectively. There were significant differences in the OS between group A, B or C and group D (P = 0.022, P = 0.004, P = 0.000).

CONCLUSION

The change of CA(125) between primary cytoreductive surgery and interval debulking surgery may be predict the recurrence type and the prognosis in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer.

摘要

目的

探讨初次肿瘤细胞减灭术与中间型肿瘤细胞减灭术期间CA125的变化,以预测上皮性卵巢癌患者达到理想中间型肿瘤细胞减灭术的概率、复发情况及预后。

方法

回顾性分析1996年1月至2009年1月收治的39例初次肿瘤细胞减灭术未达理想效果的患者。患者中位年龄56岁(范围:41 - 68岁)。根据初次肿瘤细胞减灭术与中间型肿瘤细胞减灭术期间CA125水平的变化,将所有病例分为四组,A组(初次肿瘤细胞减灭术后CA125降至正常,n = 6),B组(化疗1 - 2周期后CA125降至正常,n = 11),C组(化疗3 - 4周期后CA125降至正常,n = 14),D组(化疗后CA125未降至正常,n = 8),所有患者均接受铂类化疗。通过病理检查与CA125水平评估化疗反应,并分析复发情况及预后。

结果

(1)A、B、C、D组达到理想中间型肿瘤细胞减灭术的比例分别为6/6、8/11、9/14和2/8,其中A组或B组与D组之间存在统计学差异(P < 0.05)。(2)A、B、C、D组经病理检查评估的临床获益率分别为4/6、4/11、5/14和0,A组与D组之间存在统计学差异(P = 0.030)。(3)A组与D组的复发率存在显著差异(3/6 vs. 8/8,P = 0.024),而B组或C组与D组之间无显著差异(均P > 0.05)。A、B、C、D组的耐药复发率分别为1/6、3/11、5/14和7/8,其中A、B或C组与D组之间存在显著差异(均P < 0.05)。(4)A、B、C、D组患者的中位无进展生存期(PFS)分别为32、10、18和3个月,其中A、B或C组与D组的PFS存在显著差异(P = 0.012,P = 0.003,P = 0.032)。中位总生存期(OS)分别为44、45、44和16个月。A、B或C组与D组的OS存在显著差异(P = 0.022,P = 0.004,P = 0.000)。

结论

初次肿瘤细胞减灭术与中间型肿瘤细胞减灭术期间CA125的变化可能预测上皮性卵巢癌患者的复发类型及预后。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验