Departments of Endocrinology and Biomedical Engineering, Calcium Unit and Center for Space Medicine, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Feb;208(2):92-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2012.10.874. Epub 2012 Oct 23.
Bone densitometry was originally developed to diagnose a high risk for fragility fractures in older postmenopausal women who may have primary osteoporosis. Its widespread availability, however, has led to its use in healthy peri- and premenopausal patients and the unexpected findings of low bone density in this group of patients. Their low bone density caused much uncertainty about the likelihood of fracture risk and what treatment might be needed. Conceptually, bone density reflected bone strength, and so a low density reflected increased fracture risk. Clinical experience and the results of pivotal studies of therapy for osteoporosis suggested that bone density was only partly responsible for skeletal strength. Many structural and material properties of bone, not measured by bone density, made it resist fracturing. Clinical risk factors helped determine these characteristics, albeit imperfectly, and aided clinicians decide whether and what treatment was needed. But now, new fracture risk assessment protocols (namely, FRAX, the WHO risk assessment tool) are available to help resolve this dilemma. This paper reviews some of the clinical observations that led to rethinking the concept bone density and bone strength and how it changes the clinical approach to therapy for the healthy young patient.
骨密度测定最初是为了诊断绝经后妇女中可能患有原发性骨质疏松症的高脆性骨折风险而开发的。然而,由于其广泛应用,导致其在健康的围绝经期和绝经前患者中使用,并在这群患者中发现了低骨密度的意外结果。他们的低骨密度导致对骨折风险的可能性和可能需要的治疗存在很大的不确定性。从概念上讲,骨密度反映了骨强度,因此低骨密度反映了骨折风险的增加。临床经验和骨质疏松症治疗的关键研究结果表明,骨密度只是骨骼强度的部分原因。许多无法通过骨密度测量的骨结构和材料特性使其具有抗骨折性。临床危险因素有助于确定这些特征,尽管并不完美,并有助于临床医生决定是否需要治疗以及需要何种治疗。但是现在,新的骨折风险评估方案(即 FRAX、WHO 风险评估工具)可用于帮助解决这一难题。本文回顾了一些导致重新思考骨密度和骨强度概念以及它如何改变对健康年轻患者的治疗方法的临床观察。