Rusconi Anna Carlotta, Valeriani Giuseppe, Carlone Cristiano, Raimondo Pasquale, Quartini Adele, Coccanari de' Fornari Maria Antonietta, Biondi Massimo
Day Hospital Psichiatrico, Dipartimento di Neurologia e Psichiatria, Sapienza Università di Roma.
Riv Psichiatr. 2012 Nov-Dec;47(6):498-507. doi: 10.1708/1178.13056.
Internet Addiction Disorder (IAD) is an emerging psychiatric disorder, assimilable to impulse control problems and related to maladaptive use of new networks and social and virtual technologies.
Our study aims to analyze the presence of IAD among adolescents and to study the correlation with social interaction anxiousness. We investigated also the possibility that the Social Network (SN) represent a source of risk for the development of IAD.
The test group was composed of 250 subjects, aged between 14 and 18 years. They were administered: Young's IAT; IAS (Interaction Anxiousness Scale), AAS (Audience Anxiousness Scale) and SISST (Social Interaction Self-Statement Test) to analyze the dimension of social interaction anxiousness.
We found a rate of 2% of the IAD. The SN are the most common use of the Net in our sample, but not the most clicked sites by subjects with IAD. It should be noted, finally, a correlation between social interaction anxiety and IAD, but not a significant difference in scores of social anxiousness scales based on the SN use/non-use.
The use of SN intended as single variable doesn't correlate with increased risk for IAD, or for increased social interaction anxiousness. However, if associated with prolonged use of the net for 5-6 hours or more, or concomitant use of chat rooms and/or net gambling, we find a more significant risk of psychopathology. The data presented require further investigations, in order to guide new pathogenetic models and appropriate intervention strategies.
网络成瘾障碍(IAD)是一种新兴的精神障碍,可归类为冲动控制问题,与对新网络以及社交和虚拟技术的不适应使用有关。
我们的研究旨在分析青少年中IAD的存在情况,并研究其与社交互动焦虑的相关性。我们还调查了社交网络(SN)是否是IAD发展的风险来源。
测试组由250名年龄在14至18岁之间的受试者组成。他们接受了:杨氏网络成瘾测试(IAT);互动焦虑量表(IAS)、观众焦虑量表(AAS)和社交互动自我陈述测试(SISST),以分析社交互动焦虑的维度。
我们发现IAD的发生率为2%。在我们的样本中,社交网络是使用网络最常见的方式,但并非IAD受试者点击最多的网站。最后需要指出的是,社交互动焦虑与IAD之间存在相关性,但基于是否使用社交网络,社交焦虑量表的得分没有显著差异。
将社交网络的使用作为单一变量来看,它与IAD风险增加或社交互动焦虑增加并无关联。然而,如果与长时间上网5至6小时或更长时间,或同时使用聊天室和/或网络赌博相关联,我们会发现出现精神病理学问题的风险更高。所呈现的数据需要进一步研究,以便指导新的发病机制模型和合适的干预策略。