Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, Service de Génétique, Paris, France.
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2013 Jan;98(1):E162-73. doi: 10.1210/jc.2012-2975. Epub 2012 Nov 15.
Recommendations have not been established concerning imaging to screen SDHx mutation carriers for paraganglioma and pheochromocytoma.
Our objective was to compare the performance of gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography, contrast-enhanced computed tomography, and [(123)I]metaiodo-benzylguanidine and somatostatin receptor scintigraphies for detecting head and neck and thoracic-abdominal-pelvic paragangliomas in SDHx mutation carriers.
We conducted a prospective, multicenter study from June 2005 to December 2009 at 23 French medical centers.
A total of 238 index cases or relatives carrying mutations in SDHD, SDHB, or SDHC genes were included.
Images obtained by each technique were analyzed blind, without knowledge of results from other tests, first in each local center and then centrally.
We evaluated sensitivity, specificity, and likelihood ratios for individual and combinations of tests, the gold standard being the consensus of an expert committee.
Two hundred two tumors were diagnosed in 96 subjects. At local assessment, the sensitivity of anatomical imaging for detecting all tumors was higher (85.7%) than that of both scintigraphic techniques (42.7% for [(123)I]metaiodo-benzylguanidine and 69.5% for somatostatin receptor scintigraphy), except for thoracic localizations where somatostatin receptor scintigraphy was more sensitive (61.5 vs. 46.2% for anatomical imaging and 30.8% for [(123)I]metaiodo-benzylguanidine scintigraphy). The best diagnostic performance during local assessment was obtained by combining anatomical imaging tests and somatostatin receptor scintigraphy (sensitivity 91.7%). Central assessment significantly increased the sensitivity (98.6%) of tests in combination.
In routine practice, the imaging work-up for screening SDHx mutation carriers should include thoraco-abdomino-pelvic computed tomography, head and neck magnetic angiography, and somatostatin receptor scintigraphy. Expert centralized image assessment is recommended.
目前尚未针对 SDHx 突变携带者的嗜铬细胞瘤和副神经节瘤筛查制定影像学检查推荐意见。
本研究旨在比较钆增强磁共振血管造影、对比增强计算机断层扫描、[(123)I]间碘苄胍和生长抑素受体闪烁显像在检测 SDHx 突变携带者头颈部和胸腹部-盆腔副神经节瘤中的性能。
本研究为 2005 年 6 月至 2009 年 12 月在法国 23 个医学中心进行的一项前瞻性、多中心研究。
共纳入 238 例携带 SDHD、SDHB 或 SDHC 基因突变的索引病例或亲属。
每种技术获得的图像均进行盲法分析,不了解其他检查结果,首先在每个当地中心进行,然后进行中心分析。
评估个体和组合检查的敏感性、特异性和似然比,金标准为专家委员会的共识。
96 例患者中的 202 例肿瘤被诊断。在局部评估中,解剖成像检测所有肿瘤的敏感性(85.7%)高于两种显像技术([(123)I]间碘苄胍为 42.7%,生长抑素受体显像为 69.5%),但胸部定位除外,生长抑素受体显像更敏感(61.5%比解剖成像为 46.2%和[(123)I]间碘苄胍显像为 30.8%)。局部评估时获得的最佳诊断性能是通过结合解剖成像检查和生长抑素受体显像获得的(敏感性 91.7%)。中央评估显著提高了联合检查的敏感性(98.6%)。
在常规实践中,SDHx 突变携带者的影像学筛查应包括胸腹盆腔计算机断层扫描、头颈部磁共振血管造影和生长抑素受体闪烁显像。建议进行专家集中图像评估。