Mutesu-Kapembwa Kunda, Andrews Ben, Kapembwa Kenneth, Chi Benjamin H, Banda Yolan, Mulenga Veronica, Kankasa Chipepo
University Teaching Hospital.
Med J Zambia. 2010;37(2):64-70.
Making a diagnosis of HIV infection in children aged less than 18 months remains a challenge in low resource settings like Zambia due to the limited availability of gold standard testing with HIV DNA PCR. Clinicians in rural areas have to depend on clinical diagnosis to start HAART as they wait for the dry blood spot (DBS) for DNA PCR results sent from the urban centers. METHODS: This descriptive cross-sectional study was performed at the University Teaching Hospital, Lusaka, Zambia. 299 HIV-exposed children aged less than 18 months were enrolled following a consent procedure. Patients were evaluated for HIV infection based on the World Health Organization's presumptive diagnostic criteria (WHO-PDC), integrated management of childhood illnesses (IMCI) criteria, select physical exam abnormalities, and CD4% and findings were compared with HIV-DNA PCR results. RESULTS: Of the 299 exposed patients analyzed, 111(37%) were found to be HIV-positive by DNA PCR. The median CD4% in the infected children was 18%. WHO-PDC used on its own had 23% sensitivity (95% CI 17-32%) and 93% specificity (88-96%), respectively, whereas IMCI criterion had 10% sensitivity (6-17%) and 97% specificity (94-99%), respectively. Multivariate analysis was used to identify the most sensitive predictors when combined with the WHO-PDC and IMCI criterion. WHO-PDC with CD4% improved the sensitivity to 77% (68-83%) with a specificity of 83% (77-88%), positive predictive value (PPV) of 73% (64-80%) and negative predictive value (NPV) of 86% (80-90%). IMCI with CD4% improved sensitivity to 80% (71-87%) with a specificity of 88% (82-92%), PPV 78% (69-85%) and NPV 89% (84-93%). The addition of individual physical exam findings without CD4% improved the sensitivity of WHO-PDC only modestly. When the WHO-PDC, weight<3(rd) percentile, hepatomegaly, splenomegaly, lymphadenopathy and CD4% were combined, the sensitivity improved to 85% (77-90%), specificity 63% (56-70%), PPV 58% (50-65%) and NPV of 88% (81-92%). CONCLUSION: The WHO-PDC clinical algorithm can be improved when combined with a CD4% <25% in children less than 12 months of age and CD4% <20% in those between 12 and 18 months.
在赞比亚这样资源匮乏的地区,对18个月以下儿童进行HIV感染诊断仍是一项挑战,因为HIV DNA聚合酶链反应(PCR)这种金标准检测的可及性有限。农村地区的临床医生在等待从城市中心送来的用于DNA PCR检测的干血斑(DBS)结果时,不得不依靠临床诊断来启动高效抗逆转录病毒治疗(HAART)。
这项描述性横断面研究在赞比亚卢萨卡的大学教学医院开展。在获得同意程序后,纳入了299名18个月以下暴露于HIV的儿童。根据世界卫生组织的推定诊断标准(WHO-PDC)、儿童疾病综合管理(IMCI)标准、特定体格检查异常情况以及CD4%对患者进行HIV感染评估,并将结果与HIV-DNA PCR结果进行比较。
在分析的299名暴露患者中,111名(37%)经DNA PCR检测为HIV阳性。感染儿童的CD4%中位数为18%。单独使用WHO-PDC时,敏感性分别为23%(95%置信区间17 - 32%),特异性为93%(88 - 96%);而IMCI标准的敏感性分别为10%(6 - 17%),特异性为97%(94 - 99%)。采用多变量分析来确定与WHO-PDC和IMCI标准联合使用时最敏感的预测指标。WHO-PDC与CD4%联合使用时,敏感性提高到77%(68 - 83%),特异性为83%(77 - 88%),阳性预测值(PPV)为73%(64 - 80%),阴性预测值(NPV)为86%(80 - 90%)。IMCI与CD4%联合使用时,敏感性提高到80%(71 - 87%),特异性为88%(82 - 92%),PPV为78%(69 - 85%),NPV为89%(84 - 93%)。添加无CD4%的个体体格检查结果仅适度提高了WHO-PDC的敏感性。当WHO-PDC、体重<第3百分位数、肝肿大、脾肿大、淋巴结病和CD4%联合使用时,敏感性提高到85%(77 - 90%),特异性为63%(56 - 70%),PPV为58%(50 - 65%),NPV为88%(81 - 92%)。
对于12个月以下儿童,WHO-PDC临床算法与CD4%<25%联合使用,对于12至18个月儿童与CD4%<20%联合使用时,其效果可得到改善。