Rabbaa-Khabbaz L, Karam L, Farhat C, Azzi R, Karam Sarkis D
Department of Pharmacology and Clinical Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Saint-Joseph University, Damascus road, BP 11-5076, Beirut, Lebanon.
Ann Pharm Fr. 2012 Nov;70(6):353-9. doi: 10.1016/j.pharma.2012.09.004. Epub 2012 Oct 24.
Clinical pharmacy services are still in their very early implementation stages in Lebanon. The objective of this pilot study was to evaluate the impact of clinical pharmacist's presence at the infectious diseases department of Hôtel-Dieu de France University Hospital of Beirut (HDF) and to evaluate the acceptance of pharmacist's interventions by healthcare providers.
A 21-month prospective analysis was conducted, including 240 hospitalized patients in the infectious diseases department of HDF and 475 interventions performed by the pharmacist. A clinical pharmacist and pharmacy residents were present for 1 to 2hours/day in the ward. A pharmaceutical care plan was established and used to document patients' problems and pharmacist's interventions. Main criteria analyzed were: types and frequencies of pharmaceutical problems detected, types of pharmaceutical interventions performed, their acceptance by the prescribers and/or nurses, and factors affecting the interventions and their acceptance.
The most frequent pharmaceutical problem detected was incorrect dosage and the three most frequent interventions performed by the pharmacist were stop/start/substitute a drug, change drug dosage/or daily distribution, and change administration time. The acceptance was the highest for I.TIM (change drug administration time) and the lowest for I.FOL (request a lab test/exam/clinical follow-up).
Even a short daily pharmacist's presence is an added value in inpatient care at the infectious diseases department of Hôtel-Dieu de France University Hospital. Areas of improvement are a better communication between the pharmacist and the prescribers, a direct contact between pharmacist and patient and a longer presence of the clinical pharmacist in the clinical department.
临床药学服务在黎巴嫩仍处于非常早期的实施阶段。这项试点研究的目的是评估临床药师进驻贝鲁特法国医院(HDF)传染病科的影响,并评估医疗服务提供者对药师干预措施的接受程度。
进行了为期21个月的前瞻性分析,包括HDF传染病科的240名住院患者以及药师实施的475次干预。一名临床药师和药学住院医师每天在病房驻留1至2小时。制定了一份药学服务计划,用于记录患者的问题和药师的干预措施。分析的主要标准包括:检测到的药学问题的类型和频率、实施的药学干预措施的类型、处方医生和/或护士对这些措施的接受程度,以及影响干预措施及其接受程度的因素。
检测到的最常见药学问题是剂量不正确,药师实施的最常见的三项干预措施是停用/开始/更换药物、改变药物剂量/或每日给药量,以及改变给药时间。I.TIM(改变药物给药时间)的接受度最高,I.FOL(要求进行实验室检查/检查/临床随访)的接受度最低。
即使临床药师每天仅驻留较短时间,对于法国医院传染病科的住院患者护理也是一项增值服务。需要改进的方面包括药师与处方医生之间更好的沟通、药师与患者的直接接触,以及临床药师在临床科室更长时间的驻留。