Suppr超能文献

社区癌症中心的临终关怀。

End-of-life care at a community cancer center.

机构信息

Coastal Hospice, Salisbury, MD 21802, USA.

出版信息

J Oncol Pract. 2012 Jul;8(4):e40-4. doi: 10.1200/JOP.2011.000451. Epub 2012 May 22.

Abstract

PURPOSE

The evidence-based use of resources for cancer care at end of life (EOL) has the potential to relieve suffering, reduce health care costs, and extend life. Internal benchmarks need to be established within communities to achieve these goals. The purpose for this study was to evaluate data within our community to determine our EOL cancer practices.

METHODS

A random sample of 390 patients was obtained from the 942 cancer deaths in Wicomico County, Maryland, for calendar years 2004 to 2008. General demographic, clinical event, and survival data were obtained from that sample using cancer registry and hospice databases as well as manual medical record reviews. In addition, the intensity of EOL cancer care was assessed using previously proposed indicator benchmarks. The significance of potential relationships between variables was explored using χ(2) analyses.

RESULTS

Mean age at death was 70 years; 52% of patients were male; 34% died as a result of lung cancer. Median survival from diagnosis to death was 8.4 months with hospice admission and 5.8 months without hospice (P = .11). Four of eight intensity-of-care indicators (ie, intensive care unit [ICU] admission within last month of life, > one hospitalization within last month of life, hospital death, and hospice referral < 3 days before death) all significantly exceeded the referenced benchmarks. Hospice versus nonhospice admissions were associated (P < .001) with ICU admissions (2% v 13%) and hospital deaths (2% v 54%).

CONCLUSION

These data suggest opportunities to improve community cancer center EOL care.

摘要

目的

在生命末期(EOL),循证使用资源为癌症患者提供医疗服务,有可能减轻痛苦、降低医疗成本并延长生命。需要在社区内部建立内部基准,以实现这些目标。本研究的目的是评估我们社区内的数据,以确定我们在 EOL 癌症方面的实践情况。

方法

从马里兰州威科米科县的 942 例癌症死亡患者中随机抽取 390 例作为样本,时间范围为 2004 年至 2008 年。使用癌症登记处和临终关怀数据库以及手动病历复查,从该样本中获取一般人口统计学、临床事件和生存数据。此外,还使用先前提出的指标基准来评估 EOL 癌症护理的强度。使用卡方分析探索变量之间潜在关系的显著性。

结果

死亡时的平均年龄为 70 岁;52%的患者为男性;34%的死亡是由于肺癌所致。从诊断到死亡的中位生存时间为 8.4 个月,有临终关怀入院和 5.8 个月无临终关怀(P =.11)。八个护理强度指标中的四个(即生命最后一个月内入住重症监护病房、生命最后一个月内住院超过一次、医院死亡和临终关怀转介距离死亡不到 3 天)均显著超过参考基准。临终关怀与非临终关怀入院与 ICU 入院(2%比 13%)和医院死亡(2%比 54%)显著相关(P <.001)。

结论

这些数据表明有机会改善社区癌症中心的 EOL 护理。

相似文献

1
End-of-life care at a community cancer center.
J Oncol Pract. 2012 Jul;8(4):e40-4. doi: 10.1200/JOP.2011.000451. Epub 2012 May 22.
2
End-of-life quality metrics among medicare decedents at minority-serving cancer centers: A retrospective study.
Cancer Med. 2020 Mar;9(5):1911-1921. doi: 10.1002/cam4.2752. Epub 2020 Jan 11.
4
Factors Associated With Aggressiveness of End-of-Life Care for Lung Cancer Patients and Associated Costs of Care.
Clin Lung Cancer. 2021 May;22(3):e320-e328. doi: 10.1016/j.cllc.2020.05.017. Epub 2020 May 23.
5
Family Perspectives on Aggressive Cancer Care Near the End of Life.
JAMA. 2016 Jan 19;315(3):284-92. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.18604.
6
Trend analysis of end-of-life care between hospice and nonhospice groups of cancer patients in Taiwan for 2002-11.
Medicine (Baltimore). 2017 Aug;96(34):e7825. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000007825.
7
End-of-life care among adolescent and young adult patients with cancer living in poverty.
Cancer. 2020 Feb 15;126(4):886-893. doi: 10.1002/cncr.32609. Epub 2019 Nov 14.
8
Intensity of end-of-life care for patients with myelodysplastic syndromes: Findings from a large national database.
Cancer. 2016 Apr 15;122(8):1209-15. doi: 10.1002/cncr.29913. Epub 2016 Feb 23.
9
Novel Data Linkages to Characterize Palliative and End-Of-Life Care: Challenges and Considerations.
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2019 Nov;58(5):851-856. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2019.07.017. Epub 2019 Jul 23.
10
Timing of end-of-life care discussion with performance on end-of-life quality indicators in ovarian cancer.
Gynecol Oncol. 2013 Jul;130(1):156-61. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2013.04.010. Epub 2013 Apr 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Conceptualizing and Counting Discretionary Utilization in the Final 100 Days of Life: A Scoping Review.
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2020 Apr;59(4):894-915.e14. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2019.10.009. Epub 2019 Oct 19.
3
Measuring intensity of end of life care: a systematic review.
PLoS One. 2015 Apr 14;10(4):e0123764. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0123764. eCollection 2015.
4
Provider-based research networks demonstrate greater hospice use for minority patients with lung cancer.
J Oncol Pract. 2014 Jul;10(4):e182-90. doi: 10.1200/JOP.2013.001268. Epub 2014 Apr 29.

本文引用的文献

1
Maryland's hospital cost review commission at 40: a model for the country.
JAMA. 2011 Sep 14;306(10):1137-8. doi: 10.1001/jama.2011.1311.
2
A care model for the future: the oncology medical home.
Oncology (Williston Park). 2011 Jun;25(7):571, 575-6.
3
Rethinking hospice eligibility criteria.
JAMA. 2011 Mar 9;305(10):1031-2. doi: 10.1001/jama.2011.271.
4
American society of clinical oncology statement: toward individualized care for patients with advanced cancer.
J Clin Oncol. 2011 Feb 20;29(6):755-60. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2010.33.1744. Epub 2011 Jan 24.
5
Palliative care--a shifting paradigm.
N Engl J Med. 2010 Aug 19;363(8):781-2. doi: 10.1056/NEJMe1004139.
6
Early palliative care for patients with metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer.
N Engl J Med. 2010 Aug 19;363(8):733-42. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1000678.
7
Cancer statistics, 2010.
CA Cancer J Clin. 2010 Sep-Oct;60(5):277-300. doi: 10.3322/caac.20073. Epub 2010 Jul 7.
8
Implementation of the Quality Oncology Practice Initiative at a university comprehensive cancer center.
J Clin Oncol. 2009 Aug 10;27(23):3802-7. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2008.21.6770. Epub 2009 Jun 1.
9
Cost savings associated with US hospital palliative care consultation programs.
Arch Intern Med. 2008 Sep 8;168(16):1783-90. doi: 10.1001/archinte.168.16.1783.
10
Aggressiveness of cancer care near the end of life: is it a quality-of-care issue?
J Clin Oncol. 2008 Aug 10;26(23):3860-6. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2007.15.8253.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验