基于术前勃起功能的机器人辅助前列腺根治术后阴茎康复的最佳策略。
Optimal strategy for penile rehabilitation after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy based on preoperative erectile function.
机构信息
Department of Urology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY 10032, USA.
出版信息
BJU Int. 2013 Apr;111(4):658-65. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11487.x. Epub 2012 Nov 27.
UNLABELLED
WHAT'S KNOWN ON THE SUBJECT? AND WHAT DOES THE STUDY ADD?: Removing of prostate for the treatment of localized prostate cancer is associated with a variable loss of erectile function due to injury of the nerves of erection during operation. Some researchers have reported that after nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy (RP), the natural recovery time of erectile function is at least 2 years. Factors such as thermal damage, ischaemic injury, mechanically induced nerve stretching and the local inflammatory effects of surgical trauma may also impair the cavernous nerves during RP. The concept of penile rehabilitation was first studied by Montorsi et al. in 1997. They showed that the use of any drug or device at or after RP could maximize the recovery of erectile function. Penile rehabilitation programmes (PRPs) with vasoactive agents, such as oral phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors (PDE5Is), intraurethral and intracavernosal vasoactive agents, and vacuum erection devices (VEDs) can protect erectile tissue integrity and prevent corporal smooth muscle atrophy and diminish collagen formation. The present findings are consistent with previous reports that PRPs have a significant beneficial effect on early erectile function recovery and that preoperative erectile function is one of the important predictors of erectile function after RP. Patients can be referred for penile rehabilitation if they have any degree of erectile function (mild, moderate or normal) before operation. We also showed that the combination of PDE5Is and VEDs for PRPs offers the shortest erectile function recovery period.
OBJECTIVE
To define the optimal penile rehabilitation programme (PRP) based on preoperative Sexual Health Inventory for Men (SHIM) scores after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP).
PATIENTS AND METHODS
The medical records of 203 patients who underwent bilateral nerve-sparing RARP between 2007 and 2011 were reviewed for the present retrospective study. According to patients' preoperative erection status, group 1 (SHIM = 8-16), group 2 (SHIM = 17-21) and group 3 (SHIM = 22-25) were defined. After bilateral nerve-sparing RARP, phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors (PDE5Is), a vacuum erection device (VED), the combination of PDE5Is and a VED, or none of them were utilized by all patients for penile rehabilitation. Treatment success was defined as a rigid erection suitable for successful sexual intercourse.
RESULTS
The numbers of patients in groups 1, 2 and 3, respectively, were 9, 22 and 73, and the mean erectile function recovery periods (EFRPs) were 15.44 ± 7.73, 12.31 ± 8.12 and 8.73 ± 5.67 months (P < 0.05). Group 3 offered the best results for EFRP. Only PDE5Is or the combination of PDE5Is and VED use had a beneficial effect on EFRP (P < 0.05). Using PDE5Is and VED together provided the best result, but there was no difference between PDE5Is and a VED (P ≥ 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS
After bilateral nerve-sparing RARP, PRP with PDE5Is, including the combination of PDE5Is and VED, has a beneficial effect on erectile function recovery across all levels of baseline erectile function. Further large randomized control studies are needed to validate these findings.
目的
根据机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术(RARP)前的男性性功能健康问卷(SHIM)评分,确定最佳的阴茎康复方案(PRP)。
方法
回顾性分析 2007 年至 2011 年间接受双侧神经保留 RARP 的 203 例患者的病历资料。根据患者术前勃起状态,将其分为 3 组:组 1(SHIM=8-16)、组 2(SHIM=17-21)和组 3(SHIM=22-25)。在双侧神经保留 RARP 后,所有患者均使用磷酸二酯酶-5 抑制剂(PDE5Is)、真空勃起装置(VED)、PDE5Is 和 VED 联合应用或不应用任何药物进行阴茎康复。治疗成功定义为能够进行成功性交的坚硬勃起。
结果
组 1、组 2 和组 3 的患者人数分别为 9、22 和 73,勃起功能恢复时间(EFRP)分别为 15.44±7.73、12.31±8.12 和 8.73±5.67 个月(P<0.05)。组 3 的 EFRP 结果最佳。仅使用 PDE5Is 或 PDE5Is 和 VED 联合应用对 EFRP 有有益影响(P<0.05)。同时使用 PDE5Is 和 VED 的效果最佳,但 PDE5Is 与 VED 之间无差异(P≥0.05)。
结论
在双侧神经保留 RARP 后,PDE5Is 包括 PDE5Is 和 VED 联合应用的 PRP 对所有基线勃起功能水平的勃起功能恢复均有有益影响。需要进一步的大型随机对照研究来验证这些发现。