Suppr超能文献

[采用传统及多重PCR方法对成人社区获得性肺炎患者进行细菌病因学调查]

[Investigation of bacterial etiology with conventional and multiplex PCR methods in adult patients with community-acquired pneumonia].

作者信息

Kurutepe Semra, Ecemiş Talat, Ozgen Aylin, Biçmen Can, Celik Pınar, Aktoğu Özkan Serir, Sürücüoğlu Süheyla

机构信息

Celal Bayar University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Medical Microbiology, Manisa, Turkey.

出版信息

Mikrobiyol Bul. 2012 Oct;46(4):523-31.

Abstract

Community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) is still a serious life-threatening disease, in which the etiologic agent cannot be identified in more than 50% of patients despite advanced diagnostic methods. The most commonly used methods in the determination of CAP etiology are culture and serological tests. Since early and accurate therapy reduces the mortality in CAP cases, rapid and reliable diagnostic methods are needed. The aim of this study was to determine the bacterial etiology in adult patients with CAP by implementing multiplex polymerase chain reaction/reverse line blot hybridization (M-PCR/RLBH) assay combined with conventional methods. A total of 128 cases (94 were male; age range: 19-81 years, mean age: 58) who were admitted to our hospital and clinically diagnosed as CAP between November 2008 - November 2010, were included in the study. Respiratory samples (sputum and/or bronchoalveolar lavage) obtained from patients were searched by M-PCR/RLBH method (Gen ID®, Autoimmun Diagnostika GmbH, Germany) in terms of the presence of Streptococcus pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae, Moraxella catarrhalis, Mycoplasma pneumoniae, Chlamydia pneumoniae and Legionella pneumophila nucleic acids. The samples were simultaneously inoculated onto 5% sheep blood agar, chocolate agar, haemophilus isolation agar, buffered charcoal yeast extract-selective agar and EMB agar media for cultivation. Serum samples obtained from the cases were tested for IgM and IgG antibodies against C.pneumoniae by microimmunofluorescence (Focus Diagnostic, USA) and against L.pneumophila and M.pneumoniae by indirect immunofluorescence (Euroimmun, Germany) methods. The bacterial etiology was identified in 59 (46.1%) of 128 patients with CAP and a total of 73 pathogens were detected. The leading organism was S.pneumoniae (n= 32, 25%), followed by H.influenzae and M.pneumoniae (n= 9, 7%), gram-negative bacilli (n= 10, 7.8%), M.catarrhalis (n= 6, 4.7%), C.pneumoniae (n= 4, 3.2%), L.pneumophila (n= 2, 1.6%) and Staphylococcus aureus (n= 1, 1.4%). Infection with atypical pathogens were detected in 15 (11.7%), and mixed infections in 14 (10.9%) patients. The detection rate of microorganisms (S.pneumoniae, H.influenzae, M.catarrhalis, C.pneumoniae, L.pneumophilia, M.pneumoniae) searched by M-PCR/RLBH method was 41.4% (53/128), while those microorganisms were detected in 23.4% (30/128) of the patients by conventional methods, representing a significant difference (p< 0.05). It was concluded that M-PCR/RLBH method supplemented the determination of bacterial etiology in CAP cases by increasing the rate of detection from 23.4% to 41.4%. The results indicated that empirical treatment of CAP should primarily include antibiotics against S.pneumoniae, M.pneumoniae and H.influenzae in our region.

摘要

社区获得性肺炎(CAP)仍然是一种严重的危及生命的疾病,尽管采用了先进的诊断方法,但仍有超过50%的患者无法确定病原体。确定CAP病因最常用的方法是培养和血清学检测。由于早期准确的治疗可降低CAP病例的死亡率,因此需要快速可靠的诊断方法。本研究的目的是通过实施多重聚合酶链反应/反向线印迹杂交(M-PCR/RLBH)检测并结合传统方法,确定成年CAP患者的细菌病因。本研究纳入了2008年11月至2010年11月期间我院收治的128例临床诊断为CAP的患者(男性94例;年龄范围:19 - 81岁,平均年龄:58岁)。采用M-PCR/RLBH方法(德国Autoimmun Diagnostika GmbH公司的Gen ID®)检测患者的呼吸道样本(痰液和/或支气管肺泡灌洗)中肺炎链球菌、流感嗜血杆菌、卡他莫拉菌、肺炎支原体、肺炎衣原体和嗜肺军团菌核酸的存在情况。同时将样本接种于5%羊血琼脂、巧克力琼脂、嗜血杆菌分离琼脂、缓冲活性炭酵母提取物选择性琼脂和伊红美蓝琼脂培养基上进行培养。采用微量免疫荧光法(美国Focus Diagnostic公司)检测病例血清样本中抗肺炎衣原体的IgM和IgG抗体,采用间接免疫荧光法(德国Euroimmun公司)检测抗嗜肺军团菌和肺炎支原体的抗体。128例CAP患者中,59例(46.1%)确定了细菌病因,共检测到73种病原体。主要病原体为肺炎链球菌(n = 32,25%),其次是流感嗜血杆菌和肺炎支原体(n = 9,7%)、革兰氏阴性杆菌(n = 10,7.8%)、卡他莫拉菌(n = 6,4.7%)、肺炎衣原体(n = 4,3.2%)、嗜肺军团菌(n = 2,1.6%)和金黄色葡萄球菌(n = 1,1.4%)。15例(11.7%)患者检测到非典型病原体感染,14例(10.9%)患者检测到混合感染。M-PCR/RLBH方法检测的微生物(肺炎链球菌、流感嗜血杆菌、卡他莫拉菌、肺炎衣原体、嗜肺军团菌、肺炎支原体)检出率为41.4%(53/128),而传统方法在23.4%(30/128)的患者中检测到这些微生物,差异有统计学意义(p < 0.05)。研究得出结论,M-PCR/RLBH方法通过将检测率从23.4%提高到41.4%,补充了CAP病例细菌病因的确定。结果表明,在我们地区,CAP的经验性治疗应主要包括针对肺炎链球菌、肺炎支原体和流感嗜血杆菌的抗生素。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验