Suppr超能文献

非治疗性剖腹手术在战伤中的应用。

Nontherapeutic laparotomy in combat casualties.

机构信息

Academic Department of Military Surgery and Trauma, Royal Centre for Defence Medicine, Birmingham.

出版信息

J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012 Dec;73(6 Suppl 5):S479-82. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e318275471f.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The selective nonoperative management of ballistic abdominal injury remains contentious, particularly in the military setting. The exigencies of military practice have traditionally favored a more liberal approach to abdominal exploration. The driver for selective nonoperative management is the avoidance of morbidity incurred by nontherapeutic intervention. However, the incidence and complications of nontherapeutic laparotomy (NTL) in the military setting are not known.

METHODS

All UK military patients undergoing a laparotomy following battlefield trauma were identified from the UK Joint Theatre Trauma Registry. Procedures were classed as therapeutic laparotomy (TL) or NTL. Demographics, admission physiology, injury pattern, and mortality were compared, and complications in the NTL group were determined by Joint Theatre Trauma Registry and case record review.

RESULTS

Between March 2003 and March 2011, 130 (7.2%) of 1,813 combat wounded UK service personnel underwent a laparotomy. A total of 103 (79.2%) were considered TL, and 27 (20.8%) were NTL. There was no difference in demographic distribution or mechanism of injury. Patients undergoing TL were more likely to be hypotensive (systolic blood pressure, <90 mm Hg; p = 0.015) and have a reduced consciousness level (Glasgow Coma Scale [GCS] score ≤ 8; p = 0.006). There was a greater abdominal injury burden in the TL group (p < 0.001). There was no difference in severe extra-abdominal injury (Abbreviated Injury Scale [AIS] score ≥ 3), overall Injury Severity Score (ISS) and New ISS (NISS) scores, or mortality. Of the 27 patients who underwent NTL, 7 (25.9%) developed complications.

CONCLUSION

During the past decade, trauma laparotomy has become a relatively uncommon procedure. The NTL rate is also relatively low. This finding could be explained by the fact that selective nonoperative management is used more widely in the military setting than previously thought or that very few military injuries are amenable to nonoperative management. NTL is associated with a significant risk of complications and should therefore be minimized but not at the expense of missing a life-threatening intra-abdominal injury.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic study, level IV.

摘要

背景

在弹道性腹部损伤的选择性非手术治疗方面仍存在争议,尤其是在军事环境中。传统上,军事实践的紧迫性倾向于对腹部探查采取更宽松的方法。选择非手术治疗的驱动力是避免非治疗性干预带来的发病率。然而,在军事环境中非治疗性剖腹术(NTL)的发生率和并发症尚不清楚。

方法

从英国联合战区创伤登记处确定了所有在战场创伤后接受剖腹术的英国军事患者。手术分为治疗性剖腹术(TL)或 NTL。比较了人口统计学、入院生理、损伤模式和死亡率,并通过联合战区创伤登记处和病例记录回顾确定了 NTL 组的并发症。

结果

2003 年 3 月至 2011 年 3 月期间,1813 名参战的英国现役人员中共有 130 人(7.2%)接受了剖腹术。共有 103 例(79.2%)被认为是 TL,27 例(20.8%)是 NTL。人口统计学分布或损伤机制无差异。接受 TL 的患者更可能出现低血压(收缩压<90mmHg;p=0.015)和意识水平降低(格拉斯哥昏迷评分[GCS]≤8;p=0.006)。TL 组的腹部损伤负担更大(p<0.001)。严重的腹部外损伤(损伤严重程度评分[Abbreviated Injury Scale,AIS]≥3)、总体损伤严重程度评分(Injury Severity Score,ISS)和新损伤严重程度评分(New Injury Severity Score,NISS)评分或死亡率无差异。在接受 NTL 的 27 名患者中,有 7 名(25.9%)发生了并发症。

结论

在过去十年中,创伤性剖腹术已成为一种相对不常见的手术。NTL 率也相对较低。这一发现可以解释为,选择性非手术治疗在军事环境中的应用比以前认为的更为广泛,或者很少有军事伤害适合非手术治疗。NTL 与显著的并发症风险相关,因此应尽量减少,但不应以错过危及生命的腹腔内损伤为代价。

证据水平

治疗性研究,IV 级。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验