Hadimioglu N, Ulugol H, Akbas H, Coskunfirat N, Ertug Z, Dinckan A
Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Akdeniz University Hospital, Antalya, Turkey.
Transplant Proc. 2012 Dec;44(10):2949-54. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2012.08.004.
Choice of the anesthestic technique can reduce or even eliminate stress responses to surgery and decrease the incidence of complications. Our aim was to compare a combination of epidural anesthesia+general anesthesia with general anesthesia alone as regards perioperative insulin resistance and inflammatory activation among renal transplant recipients. Forty-six nondiabetic patients undergoing renal transplantation were prospectively randomized to the epidural anesthesia + general anesthesia group (n = 21), or general anesthesia alone group (n = 25). Plasma levels of glucose, insulin, interleukin (IL)-6, tumour necrosis factor (TNF)-α, resistin, and adiponectin were measured at baseline (T1), end of surgery (T2), postoperative first hour (T3), postoperative second hour (T4) and postoperative 24th hour (T5). Homeostasis model assessment-estimated insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) scores were calculated at every time point that the blood samples were collected. Glucose levels (P < .001) and insulin levels at the end of surgery (P = .048) and at postoperative first hour (P = .005) and HOMA-IR levels at the end of surgery (P = .012) and at postoperative first hour (P = .010) showed significantly higher values among the general anesthesia alone group when compared with the epidural+general anesthesia group. TNF-α levels at postoperative 2nd and at 24th hour (P = .005 and P = .004, respectively) and IL-6 levels at postoperative 1st and 2nd hours (P = .002 and P = .045, respectively) were significantly higher in the general anesthesia alone group when compared with the epidural+general anesthesia group. The TNF-α levels were significantly less at all time points when compared with baseline only in the epidural+general anesthesia group (T1, 33.36 vs 37.25; T2, 18.45 vs 76.52; T3, 15.18 vs 78.27; T4, 10.75 vs 66.64; T5, 2.98 vs 36.32) Hospital stays were significantly shorter among the epidural+general anesthesia group (P = .022). We showed partly attenuated surgical stress responses among patients undergoing renal transplantation using general anesthesia combined with epidural anesthesia compared with general anesthesia alone.
麻醉技术的选择可以减轻甚至消除手术应激反应,并降低并发症的发生率。我们的目的是比较肾移植受者中硬膜外麻醉+全身麻醉与单纯全身麻醉在围手术期胰岛素抵抗和炎症激活方面的差异。46例接受肾移植的非糖尿病患者被前瞻性随机分为硬膜外麻醉+全身麻醉组(n = 21)或单纯全身麻醉组(n = 25)。在基线(T1)、手术结束时(T2)、术后第1小时(T3)、术后第2小时(T4)和术后第24小时(T5)测量血浆葡萄糖、胰岛素、白细胞介素(IL)-6、肿瘤坏死因子(TNF)-α、抵抗素和脂联素水平。在采集血样的每个时间点计算稳态模型评估-估计胰岛素抵抗(HOMA-IR)评分。与硬膜外+全身麻醉组相比,单纯全身麻醉组在手术结束时(P = 0.048)、术后第1小时(P = 0.005)的血糖水平(P < 0.001)和胰岛素水平以及手术结束时(P = 0.012)和术后第1小时(P = 0.010)的HOMA-IR水平显著更高。与硬膜外+全身麻醉组相比,单纯全身麻醉组在术后第2小时和第24小时的TNF-α水平(分别为P = 0.005和P = 0.004)以及术后第1小时和第2小时的IL-6水平(分别为P = 0.002和P = 0.045)显著更高。仅在硬膜外+全身麻醉组中,与基线相比,所有时间点的TNF-α水平均显著降低(T1,33.36对37.25;T2,18.45对76.52;T3,15.18对78.27;T4,10.75对66.64;T5,2.98对36.32)。硬膜外+全身麻醉组的住院时间显著缩短(P = 0.022)。我们发现,与单纯全身麻醉相比,肾移植患者采用全身麻醉联合硬膜外麻醉时手术应激反应部分减轻。