Balgrist University Hospital, Zurich, Switzerland.
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2013 Jun;65(6):977-85. doi: 10.1002/acr.21893.
To validate a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) reference criterion for a positive sacroiliac (SI) joint MRI finding based on the level of confidence in the classification of spondyloarthritis (SpA) by expert MRI readers.
Four readers assessed SI joint MRIs in 2 inception cohorts (cohorts A and B) of 157 consecutive patients with back pain ages ≤50 years and 20 age-matched healthy controls. Patients were classified according to clinical examination and pelvic radiography as having nonradiographic axial SpA (n = 51), ankylosing spondylitis (n = 34), or nonspecific back pain (n = 72). Readers indicated their level of confidence in their classification of SpA on a 0-10 scale, where 0 = definitely not SpA and 10 = definite SpA. The MRI reference criterion was prespecified by consensus as the majority of readers indicating a confidence score of 8-10; the absence of SpA required all readers to indicate non-SpA (a confidence score of 0-4). We calculated interreader reliability and agreement between MRI-based and clinical classification using kappa statistics. We estimated cutoff values for MRI lesions attaining a specificity of ≥0.90 for SpA.
In cohorts A and B, 76.4% and 71.6% of subjects met the MRI criterion, respectively. The kappa values for interreader agreement were 0.76 for cohort A and 0.80 for cohort B and between MRI-based and clinical assessment were 0.93 for cohort A and 0.57 for cohort B. Using this MRI reference criterion, the cutoff for the number of affected SI joint quadrants needed to reach a predefined specificity of ≥0.90 was ≥2 for bone marrow edema (BME) in both cohorts and ≥1 for erosion in both cohorts, and the BME and/or erosion lesions increased sensitivity without reducing specificity.
This data-driven study using 2 inception cohorts and comparing clinical and MRI-based classification supports the case for including both erosion and BME to define a positive SI joint MRI finding for the classification of axial SpA.
基于专家 MRI 读者对脊柱关节炎 (SpA) 分类的置信水平,验证磁共振成像 (MRI) 对阳性骶髂 (SI) 关节 MRI 结果的参考标准。
4 位读者评估了 157 例年龄≤50 岁的背痛患者和 20 名年龄匹配的健康对照者的 2 个起始队列 (队列 A 和 B) 的 SI 关节 MRI。根据临床检查和骨盆 X 线摄影,患者被分类为非放射学轴向 SpA (n=51)、强直性脊柱炎 (n=34) 或非特异性背痛 (n=72)。读者在 0-10 分的范围内表示他们对 SpA 分类的置信度,其中 0 表示肯定不是 SpA,10 表示肯定是 SpA。MRI 参考标准通过共识预先指定为多数读者表示置信度评分为 8-10;如果所有读者都表示非 SpA(置信度评分为 0-4),则认为没有 SpA。我们使用kappa 统计计算基于 MRI 的分类和临床分类之间的读者间可靠性和一致性。我们估计了 MRI 病变的截断值,以达到 SpA 的特异性≥0.90。
在队列 A 和 B 中,分别有 76.4%和 71.6%的受试者符合 MRI 标准。队列 A 的读者间一致性kappa 值为 0.76,队列 B 为 0.80,基于 MRI 的分类和临床评估之间的kappa 值为 0.93 队列 A 和 0.57 队列 B。使用此 MRI 参考标准,在两个队列中,达到预设特异性≥0.90 所需的受累骶髂关节象限数的截断值均为≥2 个骨髓水肿 (BME),均为≥1 个侵蚀,并且 BME 和/或侵蚀病变增加了敏感性而不会降低特异性。
这项使用 2 个起始队列并比较临床和基于 MRI 的分类的数据分析支持包括侵蚀和 BME 来定义阳性 SI 关节 MRI 结果以用于轴向 SpA 分类的观点。