Beckmann Michael, Gardener Glenn
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Mater Health Services, Raymond Terrace, South Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2013 Apr;53(2):119-24. doi: 10.1111/ajo.12021. Epub 2012 Dec 6.
To report the outcomes of women admitted following preterm pre-labour rupture of membranes (pPROM) and to determine whether the location of care (hospital vs outpatient) influences maternal and perinatal outcomes.
A retrospective cohort study was performed using routinely collected de-identified data of 144 women (between June 2007 and June 2011) who presented to the Mater Mother's Hospital, Brisbane, Australia, with pPROM (prior to 34 weeks 0 days gestation) and who remained undelivered after 72 h from the time of ruptured membranes. Outcomes were compared for women who were subsequently managed as an outpatient (n = 53) versus those who were managed in hospital (n = 91). The two primary outcome measures were composite outcomes of (i) maternal morbidity and (ii) perinatal morbidity/mortality. The composite outcome of maternal morbidity comprised one or more of antepartum haemorrhage, clinical chorioamnionitis and/or endometritis, cord prolapse, blood transfusion, wound infection/haematoma/dehiscence/seroma. The composite outcome of perinatal morbidity/mortality comprised one or more of stillbirth, neonatal death, respiratory distress syndrome, neonatal infection, chronic neonatal lung disease, intraventricular haemorrhage, periventricular leukomalacia and necrotising enterocolitis.
When adjusted for confounders, there was no difference between hospital care and outpatient care in the composite outcome measure of perinatal morbidity/mortality (aOR 1.37; 95%CI 0.55-3.47) or the composite outcome measure of maternal morbidity (aOR 1.62; 95%CI 0.67-3.89).
Women with pPROM who remain undelivered after 72 h and are managed out of hospital do not appear to have significant differences in major adverse maternal or perinatal outcomes compared with those managed as inpatients.
报告胎膜早破(pPROM)后入院的女性的结局,并确定护理地点(医院与门诊)是否会影响孕产妇和围产期结局。
采用回顾性队列研究,使用常规收集的144名女性(2007年6月至2011年6月)的匿名数据,这些女性因pPROM(妊娠34周0天之前)就诊于澳大利亚布里斯班的马特母亲医院,且胎膜破裂72小时后仍未分娩。比较随后作为门诊患者管理的女性(n = 53)与住院管理的女性(n = 91)的结局。两个主要结局指标是:(i)孕产妇发病率和(ii)围产期发病率/死亡率的综合结局。孕产妇发病率的综合结局包括产前出血、临床绒毛膜羊膜炎和/或子宫内膜炎、脐带脱垂、输血、伤口感染/血肿/裂开/血清肿中的一项或多项。围产期发病率/死亡率的综合结局包括死产、新生儿死亡、呼吸窘迫综合征、新生儿感染、慢性新生儿肺病、脑室内出血、脑室周围白质软化和坏死性小肠结肠炎中的一项或多项。
在对混杂因素进行调整后,围产期发病率/死亡率的综合结局指标(调整后比值比1.37;95%置信区间0.55 - 3.47)或孕产妇发病率的综合结局指标(调整后比值比1.62;95%置信区间0.67 - 3.89)在住院护理和门诊护理之间没有差异。
胎膜早破且在72小时后仍未分娩并在院外管理的女性,与住院患者相比,在主要不良孕产妇或围产期结局方面似乎没有显著差异。