Department of Integrative Physiology, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado 80045, USA.
J Neurophysiol. 2013 Feb;109(4):1055-64. doi: 10.1152/jn.00437.2012. Epub 2012 Dec 5.
The purpose of the study was to compare the discharge characteristics of biceps brachii motor units of young and old adults when they performed steady, submaximal contractions while the arm supported different inertial loads. Young (28 ± 4 yr; n = 16) and old (75 ± 4 yr; n = 14) adults performed steady contractions with the elbow flexors at target forces set at either small (11.7 ± 4.4% maximum) or large (17.8 ± 6.5% maximum) differences below the recruitment threshold force of the motor unit (n = 40). The task was to maintain an elbow angle at 1.57 rad until the motor unit was recruited and discharged action potentials for ∼120 s. Time to recruitment was longer for the larger target force difference (187 ± 227 s vs. 23 ± 46 s, P < 0.001). Once recruited, motor units discharged action potentials either repetitively or intermittently, with a greater proportion of motor units exhibiting the repetitive pattern for old adults. Discharge rate at recruitment and during the steady contraction was similar for the two target force differences for old adults but was greater for the small target force difference for young adults. Discharge variability was similar at recruitment for the two age groups but less for the old adults during the steady contraction. The greatest difference between the present results and those reported previously when the arm pulled against a rigid restraint was that old adults modulated discharge rate less than young adults across the two contraction intensities for both load types.
本研究旨在比较年轻和老年成年人在手臂支撑不同惯性负载时进行稳定、亚最大收缩时肱二头肌运动单位的放电特征。年轻(28 ± 4 岁;n = 16)和老年(75 ± 4 岁;n = 14)成年人在肘部屈肌以设定的目标力进行稳定收缩,目标力设定在低于运动单位募集阈值力的小(11.7 ± 4.4%最大)或大(17.8 ± 6.5%最大)差异(n = 40)。任务是将肘部角度保持在 1.57 弧度,直到运动单位被募集并发放动作电位约 120 秒。较大的目标力差异的募集时间更长(187 ± 227 秒比 23 ± 46 秒,P < 0.001)。一旦募集,运动单位要么重复发放动作电位,要么间歇性发放动作电位,老年成年人中更大部分的运动单位表现出重复模式。对于老年成年人,在两个目标力差异下,募集时和稳定收缩期间的放电率相似,但对于年轻成年人,较小的目标力差异的放电率更高。对于两个年龄组,募集时的放电变异性相似,但在稳定收缩期间,老年成年人的放电变异性较低。与之前手臂对抗刚性约束时的结果相比,本研究结果的最大差异是,对于两种负载类型,老年成年人在两个收缩强度下的放电率调节都比年轻成年人少。