Medical Management Centre, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Osteoporos Int. 2013 Apr;24(4):1491-502. doi: 10.1007/s00198-012-2115-6. Epub 2012 Dec 7.
The objective was to undertake a health economic analysis of denosumab for the treatment of osteoporosis in women from the UK, using the FRAX® tool. Denosumab was cost-effective in women with a risk of major osteoporotic fracture meeting or exceeding approximately 20% who are unable to take, comply with or tolerate generic alendronate.
Denosumab is a novel biologic agent developed for the treatment of osteoporosis, which has been shown to reduce the risk of fractures in a phase-III trial. The objective of the present study was to undertake a health economic analysis of denosumab in women from the UK. Ten-year probabilities of a major osteoporotic fracture at which denosumab is a cost-effective alternative to no treatment, generic alendronate, risedronate and strontium ranelate were estimated.
A previously published Markov model was adapted to incorporate fracture and mortality risk assessments based on absolute fracture probability, as estimated by FRAX®. The model included treatment persistence and residual effect after discontinuation.
At a willingness-to-pay (WTP) of £30,000 per quality-adjusted life year and a 10-year fracture probability equivalent to a woman with a prior fragility fracture, denosumab was cost-effective compared to no treatment from the age of 70 years. At the same WTP, denosumab was-irrespective of age-cost-effective compared to no treatment at a major osteoporotic fracture probability of approximately 20%. Denosumab was estimated to cost-effectively replace strontium, risedronate and generic alendronate at 10-year probabilities exceeding 11, 19 and 32%, respectively.
FRAX® facilitates the estimation of cost-effectiveness-based intervention thresholds applicable to patients with different combinations of clinical risk factors, which more closely matches the situation in clinical practice. Denosumab is cost-effective in patients with major osteoporotic fracture probabilities meeting or exceeding approximately 20% who are unable to take, comply with or tolerate generic alendronate.
目的是使用 FRAX®工具对英国女性骨质疏松症的地舒单抗治疗进行健康经济分析。对于不能服用、不能遵守或不能耐受普通阿仑膦酸盐的风险为主要骨质疏松性骨折的女性,当符合或超过约 20%时,地舒单抗具有成本效益。
地舒单抗是一种新型生物制剂,用于治疗骨质疏松症,临床试验表明它可降低骨折风险。本研究的目的是对英国女性的地舒单抗进行健康经济分析。估计了地舒单抗作为无治疗、普通阿仑膦酸盐、利塞膦酸盐和雷奈酸锶的成本效益替代方案的十年主要骨质疏松性骨折概率。
以前发表的 Markov 模型经过改编,纳入了基于 FRAX®估算的绝对骨折概率的骨折和死亡率风险评估。该模型包括治疗持久性和停药后的残留效应。
在 30,000 英镑/WTP(每质量调整生命年)和相当于先前脆性骨折女性的 10 年骨折概率的情况下,地舒单抗从 70 岁起与无治疗相比具有成本效益。在相同的 WTP 下,无论年龄大小,当地舒单抗的主要骨质疏松性骨折概率约为 20%时,与无治疗相比具有成本效益。估计地舒单抗以 10 年概率超过 11%、19%和 32%分别替代锶、利塞膦酸盐和普通阿仑膦酸盐具有成本效益。
FRAX®有助于估算适用于具有不同临床危险因素组合的患者的基于成本效益的干预阈值,更符合临床实践情况。当地舒单抗的主要骨质疏松性骨折概率符合或超过约 20%,且不能服用、不能遵守或不能耐受普通阿仑膦酸盐的患者具有成本效益。