Suppr超能文献

一项比较拉帕替尼联合帕唑帕尼与拉帕替尼治疗人表皮生长因子受体 2(HER2)阳性炎性乳腺癌患者的随机 II 期研究。

A randomized phase II study of lapatinib + pazopanib versus lapatinib in patients with HER2+ inflammatory breast cancer.

机构信息

MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.

出版信息

Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2013 Jan;137(2):471-82. doi: 10.1007/s10549-012-2369-x. Epub 2012 Dec 13.

Abstract

This multi-center Phase II study evaluated lapatinib, pazopanib, and the combination in patients with relapsed HER2+ inflammatory breast cancer. In Cohort 1, 76 patients were randomized 1:1 to receive lapatinib 1,500 mg + placebo or lapatinib 1,500 mg + pazopanib 800 mg (double-blind) once daily until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or death. Due to high-grade diarrhea observed with this dose combination in another study (VEG20007), Cohort 1 was closed. The protocol was amended such that an additional 88 patients (Cohort 2) were randomized in a 5:5:2 ratio to receive daily monotherapy lapatinib 1,500 mg, lapatinib 1,000 mg + pazopanib 400 mg, or monotherapy pazopanib 800 mg, respectively. The primary endpoint was overall response rate (ORR). Secondary endpoints included duration of response, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival, and safety. In Cohort 1, ORR for the lapatinib (n = 38) and combination (n = 38) arms was 29 and 45 %, respectively; median PFS was 16.1 and 14.3 weeks, respectively. Grade ≥3 adverse events (AEs) were more frequent in the combination arm (71 %) than in the lapatinib arm (24 %). Dose reductions and interruptions due to AEs were also more frequent in the combination arm (45 and 53 %, respectively) than in the lapatinib monotherapy arm (0 and 11 %, respectively). In Cohort 2, ORR for patients treated with lapatinib (n = 36), lapatinib + pazopanib (n = 38), and pazopanib (n = 13) was 47, 58, and 31 %, respectively; median PFS was 16.0, 16.0, and 11.4 weeks, respectively. In the lapatinib, combination, and pazopanib therapy arms, grade ≥3 AEs were reported for 17, 50, and 46 % of patients, respectively, and the incidence of discontinuations due to AEs was 0, 24, and 23 %, respectively. The lapatinib-pazopanib combination was associated with a numerically higher ORR but no increase in PFS compared to lapatinib alone. The combination also had increased toxicity resulting in more dose reductions, modifications, and treatment delays. Activity with single-agent lapatinib was confirmed in this population.

摘要

这项多中心 II 期研究评估了拉帕替尼、帕唑帕尼和联合用药在复发的 HER2+炎性乳腺癌患者中的疗效。在队列 1 中,76 名患者按 1:1 随机分为两组,分别接受拉帕替尼 1500mg+安慰剂或拉帕替尼 1500mg+帕唑帕尼 800mg(双盲),每天一次,直到疾病进展、无法耐受的毒性或死亡。由于在另一项研究(VEG20007)中观察到这种剂量联合用药出现 3 级以上腹泻,因此队列 1 关闭。方案进行了修订,另外 88 名患者(队列 2)按 5:5:2 的比例随机分配,分别接受每日单药拉帕替尼 1500mg、拉帕替尼 1000mg+帕唑帕尼 400mg 或单药帕唑帕尼 800mg 治疗。主要终点是总缓解率(ORR)。次要终点包括缓解持续时间、无进展生存期(PFS)、总生存期和安全性。在队列 1 中,拉帕替尼(n=38)和联合用药(n=38)组的 ORR 分别为 29%和 45%;中位 PFS 分别为 16.1 和 14.3 周。联合用药组(71%)比拉帕替尼组(24%)更常见≥3 级不良事件(AE)。联合用药组因 AE 导致的剂量减少和中断也比拉帕替尼单药组更常见(分别为 45%和 53%,0%和 11%)。在队列 2 中,接受拉帕替尼(n=36)、拉帕替尼+帕唑帕尼(n=38)和帕唑帕尼(n=13)治疗的患者的 ORR 分别为 47%、58%和 31%;中位 PFS 分别为 16.0、16.0 和 11.4 周。拉帕替尼、联合用药和帕唑帕尼治疗组中,分别有 17%、50%和 46%的患者发生≥3 级 AE,因 AE 而停药的发生率分别为 0%、24%和 23%。与拉帕替尼单药治疗相比,拉帕替尼-帕唑帕尼联合用药的 ORR 更高,但 PFS 无改善。联合用药还导致毒性增加,需要更多的剂量减少、调整和治疗延迟。在这一人群中,单药拉帕替尼的活性得到了证实。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/972b/3539065/3ddaed237626/10549_2012_2369_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验