School of Community-based Medicine, University of Manchester, UK.
Int Rev Psychiatry. 2012 Dec;24(6):556-67. doi: 10.3109/09540261.2012.741063.
The somatoform disorders, as currently defined in DSM-IV and ICD-10, have been criticized for their complexity and poor clinical utility. In this paper we consider these criticisms as well as the conceptual question of whether there is sufficient evidence for classifying them as mental and behavioural disorders. The review suggests that, as currently defined, somatoform disorders do not fulfil a recently articulated set of criteria for mental and behavioural disorders. In particular, the disorders are not defined according to positive psychological and behavioural disorders and evidence is sparse to support their classification as different and distinct diagnoses. Any revision of the disorders should not be based on 'medically unexplained' symptoms. Rather, the relevant diagnoses should include a combination of bothersome somatic symptoms with several other psychological features including beliefs about somatic symptoms and evidence of marked concerns about health and illness. Finally, the review presents a set of proposals for the revision of these disorders, by the Somatic Disorders and Dissociative Disorders Working Group of the WHO International Advisory Group for the Revision of ICD-10 Mental and Behavioural Disorders, which attempt to take account of the criticisms and current understanding of somatic experiences.
目前在 DSM-IV 和 ICD-10 中定义的躯体形式障碍因其复杂性和临床实用性差而受到批评。在本文中,我们考虑了这些批评以及是否有足够的证据将其归类为精神和行为障碍的概念问题。综述表明,按照目前的定义,躯体形式障碍不符合最近提出的一系列精神和行为障碍的标准。特别是,这些障碍不是根据阳性心理和行为障碍来定义的,并且支持将其归类为不同和独特的诊断的证据很少。任何对这些障碍的修订都不应该基于“无法用医学解释”的症状。相反,相关的诊断应该包括令人烦恼的躯体症状与其他一些心理特征的结合,包括对躯体症状的信念和对健康和疾病的明显关注的证据。最后,WHO 国际精神和行为障碍分类修订咨询组躯体障碍和分离障碍工作组提出了一套修订这些障碍的建议,试图考虑到这些批评和对躯体体验的当前理解。