Network of Excellence for Functional Biomaterials, IDA Business Park, Dangan, National University of Ireland Galway, Galway, Ireland.
Biomaterials. 2013 Mar;34(8):2130-41. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.11.049. Epub 2012 Dec 13.
Over the last twenty years there have been several reports on the use of nonviral vectors to facilitate gene transfer in the mammalian brain. Whilst a large emphasis has been placed on vector transfection efficiency, the study of the adverse effects upon the brain, caused by the vectors themselves, remains completely overshadowed. To this end, a study was undertaken to study the tissue response to three commercially available transfection agents in the brain of adult Sprague Dawley rats. The response to these transfection agents was compared to adeno-associated viral vector (AAV), PBS and naked DNA. Furthermore, the use of a collagen hollow sphere (CHS) sustained delivery system was analysed for its ability to reduce striatal toxicity of the most predominantly studied polymer vector, polyethyleneimine (PEI). The size of the gross tissue loss at the injection site was analysed after immunohistochemical staining and was used as an indication of acute toxicity. Polymeric vectors showed similar levels of acute brain toxicity as seen with AAV, and CHS were able to significantly reduce the toxicity of the PEI vector. In addition; the host response to the vectors was measured in terms of reactive astrocytes and microglial cell recruitment. To understand whether this gross tissue loss was caused by the direct toxicity of the vectors themselves an in vitro study on primary astrocytes was conducted. All vectors reduced the viability of the cells which is brought about by direct necrosis and apoptosis. The CHS delivery system reduced cell necrosis in the early stages of post administration. In conclusion, whilst polymeric gene vectors cause acute necrosis, administration in the brain causes adverse effects no worse than that of an AAV vector. Furthermore, packaging the PEI vector with CHS reduces surface charge and direct toxicity without elevating the host response.
在过去的二十年中,已有几篇关于使用非病毒载体促进哺乳动物大脑中的基因转移的报告。虽然重点主要放在载体转染效率上,但载体本身对大脑的不良影响的研究仍然完全被忽视。为此,进行了一项研究,以研究三种市售转染剂在成年 Sprague Dawley 大鼠大脑中的组织反应。将这些转染剂的反应与腺相关病毒载体(AAV)、PBS 和裸露 DNA 进行了比较。此外,还分析了胶原空心球(CHS)持续递送系统在降低最受研究的聚合物载体聚乙烯亚胺(PEI)纹状体毒性方面的能力。通过免疫组织化学染色分析注射部位大体组织损失的大小,并将其用作急性毒性的指示。聚合物载体显示出与 AAV 相似的急性脑毒性水平,而 CHS 能够显著降低 PEI 载体的毒性。此外,还测量了宿主对载体的反应,以评估反应性星形胶质细胞和小胶质细胞的募集情况。为了了解这种大体组织损失是否是由载体本身的直接毒性引起的,对原代星形胶质细胞进行了体外研究。所有载体都降低了细胞活力,这是由直接坏死和细胞凋亡引起的。CHS 递送系统在给药后早期减少了细胞坏死。总之,虽然聚合物基因载体引起急性坏死,但在大脑中的给药引起的不良影响并不比 AAV 载体更严重。此外,用 CHS 包装 PEI 载体可以降低表面电荷和直接毒性,而不会引起宿主反应。