Goyal C Ram, Klukowska Malgorzata, Grender Julie M, Cunningham Pam, Qaqish Jimmy
BioSci Research Canada, Ltd., Ontario, Canada.
Am J Dent. 2012 Sep;25 Spec No A(A):21A-26A.
To evaluate the plaque- and gingivitis-reducing efficacy of a newly developed multi-directional power toothbrush in comparison to a commercially-available sonic power toothbrush.
Adult subjects with mild-to-moderate gingivitis were eligible for this 4-week, randomized and controlled, single-center, examiner-blinded, parallel group study. At baseline, plaque and gingivitis status was assessed with the Rustogi Modified Navy Plaque Index (RMNPI), Lobene Modified Gingival Index (MGI), and Gingival Bleeding Index (GBI). Subjects meeting all eligibility criteria were randomly assigned to one of two power toothbrushes: a novel multi-directional power toothbrush (Oral-B Professional Deep Sweep TRICLEAN 1000 also marketed as Oral-B TriZone) or the marketed sonic control toothbrush (Philips Sonicare Essence 5500). A single supervised brushing occurred onsite at baseline; thereafter toothbrushing was conducted twice daily at home in accordance with manufacturer instructions using the assigned power brush. At 4 weeks post-baseline, subjects returned for MGI, GBI, and RMNPI evaluations to determine the plaque and gingivitis efficacy of the respective brushes.
All 130 subjects completing the trial were evaluable. Both the novel multi-directional power and sonic control brushes produced significant mean reductions in gingivitis, gingival bleeding and plaque (whole mouth and region-specific) at Week 4 in comparison to baseline (P < 0.001). The new multi-directional power brush performed statistically significantly better (P < or = 0.001) in all efficacy measures after 4 weeks ofbrushing, providing superior adjusted mean relative reduction benefits versus the sonic control brush of 48% for MGI, 52% for GBI, 26% for whole mouth RMNPI, 58% for gingival margin RMNPI plaque, and 33% for interproximal (approximal) RMNPI plaque. Both toothbrushes were well-tolerated.
评估一款新研发的多向电动牙刷相较于市售声波电动牙刷在减少牙菌斑和牙龈炎方面的效果。
患有轻度至中度牙龈炎的成年受试者符合参加这项为期4周的随机对照单中心检查者盲法平行组研究的条件。在基线时,使用Rustogi改良海军牙菌斑指数(RMNPI)、Lobene改良牙龈指数(MGI)和牙龈出血指数(GBI)评估牙菌斑和牙龈炎状况。符合所有入选标准的受试者被随机分配到两种电动牙刷之一:一种新型多向电动牙刷(欧乐-B专业深度清洁TRICLEAN 1000,也称为欧乐-B三区清洁)或市售声波对照牙刷(飞利浦Sonicare Essence 5500)。在基线时在现场进行一次有监督的刷牙;此后,按照制造商的说明,使用分配的电动牙刷在家中每天刷牙两次。在基线后4周,受试者返回进行MGI、GBI和RMNPI评估,以确定各自牙刷在减少牙菌斑和牙龈炎方面的效果。
所有130名完成试验的受试者均可进行评估。与基线相比,新型多向电动牙刷和声波对照牙刷在第4周时均使牙龈炎、牙龈出血和牙菌斑(全口和特定区域)的平均水平显著降低(P < 0.001)。在刷牙4周后的所有效果指标中,新型多向电动牙刷的表现具有统计学上的显著优势(P ≤ 0.001),与声波对照牙刷相比,其调整后的平均相对降低效益更高,MGI为48%,GBI为52%,全口RMNPI为26%,牙龈边缘RMNPI牙菌斑为58%,邻面(近中)RMNPI牙菌斑为33%。两种牙刷的耐受性都很好。