Goldstein Judah P, Andrew Melissa K, Travers Andrew
Interdisciplinary PhD (C), Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada ; Emergency Health Services Nova Scotia, Halifax, Canada.
Can Geriatr J. 2012 Mar;15(1):16-22. doi: 10.5770/cgj.15.27. Epub 2012 Mar 14.
Older adults use more health-care services per capita than younger age groups and the older adult population varies greatly in its needs. Evidence suggests that there is a critical distinction between relative frailty and fitness in older adults. Here, we review how frailty is described in the pre-hospital literature and in the broader emergency medicine literature.
PubMed was used as the primary database, but was augmented by searches of CINAHL and EMBASE. Articles were included if they focused on patients 60 years and older and implemented a definition of frailty or risk screening tool in the Emergency Medical Services (EMS) or Emergency Department setting.
IN THE BROAD CLINICAL LITERATURE, THREE TYPES OF MEASURES CAN BE IDENTIFIED: frailty index measures, frailty scales, and a phenotypic definition. Each offers advantages and disadvantages for the EMS stakeholder. We identified no EMS literature on frailty conceptualization or management, although some risk measures from emergency medicine use terms that overlap with the frailty literature.
There is a paucity of research on frailty in the Emergency Medical Services literature. No research was identified that specifically addressed frailty conceptualization or management in EMS patients. There is a compelling need for further research in this area.
老年人人均使用的医疗服务比年轻人群体更多,且老年人群体的需求差异很大。有证据表明,老年人的相对虚弱和健康状况之间存在关键区别。在此,我们回顾在院前文献和更广泛的急诊医学文献中如何描述虚弱。
以PubMed作为主要数据库,但通过检索CINAHL和EMBASE进行补充。如果文章关注60岁及以上的患者,并在紧急医疗服务(EMS)或急诊科环境中采用了虚弱定义或风险筛查工具,则纳入这些文章。
在广泛的临床文献中,可以识别出三种类型的测量方法:虚弱指数测量、虚弱量表和表型定义。每种方法对EMS利益相关者都有优缺点。我们未发现关于虚弱概念化或管理的EMS文献,尽管急诊医学中的一些风险测量使用的术语与虚弱文献有重叠。
急诊医疗服务文献中关于虚弱的研究很少。未发现专门针对EMS患者虚弱概念化或管理的研究。该领域迫切需要进一步研究。