Suppr超能文献

外科医生特征和技术对食管切除术后结果的影响:一项全国性研究。

Impact of surgeon demographics and technique on outcomes after esophageal resections: a nationwide study.

机构信息

Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Missouri-Columbia School of Medicine, Columbia, MO 65212, USA.

出版信息

Ann Thorac Surg. 2013 Mar;95(3):1064-9. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2012.10.038. Epub 2012 Dec 20.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Thoracic, cardiac, and general surgeons perform esophageal resections in the United States. This article examines the impact of surgeon subspecialty on outcomes after esophagectomy.

METHODS

Esophagectomies performed between 1998 and 2008 were identified in the Nationwide Inpatient Sample. Surgeons were classified as thoracic, cardiac, or general surgeons if greater than 65% of their operative case mix was representative of their specialty. Surgeons with less than 65% of a specialty-specific case mix served as controls. Regression equations calculated the independent effect of surgeon specialty, surgeon volume, and operative approach (transhiatal versus transthoracic) on outcomes.

RESULTS

Of the 40,589 patients who underwent esophagectomies, surgeon identifiers were available for 23,529 patients. Based on case mix, thoracic, cardiac, and general surgeons performed 3,027 (12.9%), 688 (2.9%), and 4,086 (17.4%) esophagectomies, respectively. Operative technique did not independently affect risk-adjusted outcomes-mortality, morbidity, and failure to rescue (defined as death after a complication). Surgeon volume independently lowered mortality and failure to rescue by 4% (p ≤ 0.002 for both), but not complications (p = 0.6). High-volume hospitals (>12 procedures/year) independently lowered mortality (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 0.67, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.46-0.96), and failure to rescue (AOR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.44-0.94). Esophageal resections performed by general surgeons were associated with higher mortality (AOR, 1.87; 95% CI 1.02-3.45) and failure to rescue (AOR, 1.95; 95% CI, 1.06-3.61) but not complications (AOR, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.64-1.49).

CONCLUSIONS

General surgeons perform the major proportion of esophagectomies in the United States. Surgeon subspecialty is not associated with the risk of complications developing but instead is associated with mortality and failure to rescue from complications. Surgeon subspecialty case mix is an important determinant of outcomes for patients undergoing esophagectomy.

摘要

背景

在美国,胸外科、心脏外科和普通外科医生都进行食管切除术。本文研究了外科医生亚专科对食管切除术后结果的影响。

方法

在全国住院患者样本中确定了 1998 年至 2008 年间进行的食管切除术。如果外科医生的手术组合中超过 65%代表其专业,则将其归类为胸外科、心脏外科或普通外科医生。手术组合中少于 65%的专科特定手术组合的外科医生则作为对照。回归方程计算了外科医生专业、外科医生数量和手术途径(经胸和经食管裂孔)对结果的独立影响。

结果

在接受食管切除术的 40589 名患者中,有 23529 名患者的外科医生身份信息可用。根据手术组合,胸外科、心脏外科和普通外科医生分别进行了 3027(12.9%)、688(2.9%)和 4086(17.4%)例食管切除术。手术技术并不独立影响风险调整后的结果——死亡率、发病率和救援失败(定义为并发症后死亡)。外科医生数量独立降低了 4%的死亡率和救援失败率(p≤0.002),但不能降低并发症发生率(p=0.6)。高容量医院(>12 例/年)独立降低了死亡率(调整后的优势比[OR],0.67,95%置信区间[CI],0.46-0.96)和救援失败率(调整后的 OR,0.64;95% CI,0.44-0.94)。普通外科医生进行的食管切除术与更高的死亡率(调整后的 OR,1.87;95% CI,1.02-3.45)和救援失败率(调整后的 OR,1.95;95% CI,1.06-3.61)相关,但与并发症发生率(调整后的 OR,0.97;95% CI,0.64-1.49)无关。

结论

普通外科医生在美国进行了大部分的食管切除术。外科医生的亚专科与并发症发生的风险无关,而是与并发症引起的死亡率和救援失败率相关。外科医生的亚专科手术组合是影响接受食管切除术患者结局的重要决定因素。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验