Laboratório de Pneumologia LIM09, Faculdade de Medicina da University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Crit Care Med. 2013 Feb;41(2):536-45. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3182711972.
The benefits of spontaneous breathing over muscle paralysis have been proven mainly in mild lung injury; no one has yet evaluated the effects of spontaneous breathing in severe lung injury. We investigated the effects of spontaneous breathing in two different severities of lung injury compared with muscle paralysis.
Prospective, randomized, animal study.
University animal research laboratory.
Twenty-eight New Zealand white rabbits.
Rabbits were randomly divided into the mild lung injury (surfactant depletion) group or severe lung injury (surfactant depletion followed by injurious mechanical ventilation) group and ventilated with 4-hr low tidal volume ventilation with spontaneous breathing or without spontaneous breathing (prevented by a neuromuscular blocking agent). Inspiratory pressure was adjusted to control tidal volume to 5-7 mL/kg, maintaining a plateau pressure less than 30 cm H2O. Dynamic CT was used to evaluate changes in lung aeration and the regional distribution of tidal volume.
In mild lung injury, spontaneous breathing improved oxygenation and lung aeration by redistribution of tidal volume to dependent lung regions. However, in severe lung injury, spontaneous breathing caused a significant increase in atelectasis with cyclic collapse. Because of the severity of lung injury, this group had higher plateau pressure and more excessive spontaneous breathing effort, resulting in the highest transpulmonary pressure and the highest driving pressure. Although no improvements in lung aeration were observed, muscle paralysis with severe lung injury resulted in better oxygenation, more even tidal ventilation, and less histological lung injury.
In animals with mild lung injury, spontaneous breathing was beneficial to lung recruitment; however, in animals with severe lung injury, spontaneous breathing could worsen lung injury, and muscle paralysis might be more protective for injured lungs by preventing injuriously high transpulmonary pressure and high driving pressure.
自主呼吸相对于肌肉麻痹的益处已在轻度肺损伤中得到证实;但尚未有人评估自主呼吸对严重肺损伤的影响。我们研究了与肌肉麻痹相比,自主呼吸在两种不同严重程度的肺损伤中的作用。
前瞻性、随机、动物研究。
大学动物研究实验室。
28 只新西兰白兔。
兔子被随机分为轻度肺损伤(表面活性剂耗竭)组或严重肺损伤(表面活性剂耗竭后机械性损伤通气)组,并接受 4 小时低潮气量通气,有或无自主呼吸(用神经肌肉阻滞剂阻止)。吸气压力调整以控制潮气量至 5-7ml/kg,保持平台压小于 30cmH2O。动态 CT 用于评估肺充气和潮气量的区域性分布变化。
在轻度肺损伤中,自主呼吸通过将潮气量重新分布到依赖区来改善氧合和肺充气。然而,在严重肺损伤中,自主呼吸导致周期性塌陷的肺不张显著增加。由于肺损伤的严重程度,该组平台压更高,过度的自主呼吸努力更大,导致跨肺压和驱动压最高。尽管肺充气没有改善,但严重肺损伤时肌肉麻痹可改善氧合、更均匀的潮气量通气,并减少组织学肺损伤。
在轻度肺损伤动物中,自主呼吸有利于肺复张;然而,在严重肺损伤动物中,自主呼吸可能会加重肺损伤,肌肉麻痹通过防止过高的跨肺压和驱动压,可能对受伤的肺更具保护作用。