Suppr超能文献

血管内腹主动脉瘤修复术在伴有敌对和友好颈部解剖结构患者中的结局的荟萃分析。

A meta-analysis of outcomes of endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair in patients with hostile and friendly neck anatomy.

机构信息

Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Manchester Royal Infirmary, Central Manchester University Hospitals, Manchester, United Kingdom.

出版信息

J Vasc Surg. 2013 Feb;57(2):527-38. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2012.09.050. Epub 2012 Dec 21.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

An increasing number of abdominal aortic aneurysms with unfavorable proximal neck anatomy are treated with standard endograft devices. Skepticism exists with regard to the safety and efficacy of this practice.

METHODS

A systematic review of the literature was undertaken to identify all studies comparing the outcomes of endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) in patients with hostile and friendly infrarenal neck anatomy. Hostile neck conditions were defined as conditions that were not consistent with the instructions for use of the endograft devices employed in the selected studies. Outcome data were pooled, and combined overall effect sizes were calculated using fixed or random effects models.

RESULTS

Seven observational studies reporting on 1559 patients (hostile anatomy group, 714 patients; friendly anatomy group, 845 patients) were included. Patients with hostile anatomy required an increased number of adjunctive procedures to achieve proximal seal compared with patients with friendly anatomy (odds ratio [OR], 3.050; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.884-4.938). Although patients with unfavorable neck anatomy had an increased risk of developing 30-day morbidity (OR, 2.278; 95% CI, 1.025-5.063), no significant differences in the incidence of type I endoleak and reintervention rates within 30 days of treatment between the two groups were identified (OR, 2.467 and 1.082; 95% CI, 0.562-10.823 and 0.096-12.186). Patients with hostile anatomy had a fourfold increased risk of developing type I endoleak (OR, 4.563; 95% CI, 1.430-14.558) and a ninefold increased risk of aneurysm-related mortality within 1 year of treatment (OR, 9.378; 95% CI, 1.595-55.137).

CONCLUSIONS

Insufficient high-level evidence for or against performing standard EVAR in patients with hostile neck anatomy exists. Our analysis suggests EVAR should be cautiously used in patients with anatomic neck constraints.

摘要

背景

越来越多具有不利近端颈部解剖结构的腹主动脉瘤采用标准的血管内移植物治疗。对于这种治疗方法的安全性和有效性存在怀疑。

方法

对文献进行系统回顾,以确定所有比较血管内动脉瘤修复术(EVAR)在具有敌对和友好的肾下颈部解剖结构患者中的结果的研究。敌对的颈部条件被定义为不符合所选研究中使用的移植物设备使用说明的条件。汇总结果数据,并使用固定或随机效应模型计算合并的总体效应大小。

结果

纳入了 7 项观察性研究,共报告了 1559 例患者(敌对解剖组 714 例,友好解剖组 845 例)。与具有友好解剖结构的患者相比,具有不利解剖结构的患者需要更多的辅助手术来实现近端密封(比值比 [OR],3.050;95%置信区间 [CI],1.884-4.938)。尽管具有不利颈部解剖结构的患者在 30 天内发生发病率的风险增加(OR,2.278;95%CI,1.025-5.063),但两组之间在 30 天内治疗后发生 I 型内漏和再干预率无显著差异(OR,2.467 和 1.082;95%CI,0.562-10.823 和 0.096-12.186)。具有敌对解剖结构的患者发生 I 型内漏的风险增加了四倍(OR,4.563;95%CI,1.430-14.558),并且在治疗后 1 年内发生与动脉瘤相关的死亡率增加了九倍(OR,9.378;95%CI,1.595-55.137)。

结论

目前对于在具有敌对颈部解剖结构的患者中进行标准 EVAR 的利弊尚无足够的高级别证据。我们的分析表明,在具有解剖学颈部限制的患者中,应谨慎使用 EVAR。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验